[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases
From: |
Fam Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 2017 11:40:00 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) |
I noticed you were wondering what happend to this message in the patchew thread:
http://patchew.org/QEMU/address@hidden/
Markus, apparently this is because of the unusual "In-Reply-To" header of your
message, which confuses patchew:
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
(=?utf-8?Q?=22Marc-Andr=C3=A9?=
Lureau"'s message of "Tue, 9 May 2017 20:35:45 +0300")
Is this an extension of your email client, or a standard?
In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.4:
> The "References:" and "In-Reply-To:" field each contain one or more
> unique message identifiers, optionally separated by CFWS.
>
> The message identifier (msg-id) is similar in syntax to an angle-addr
> construct without the internal CFWS.
>
> message-id = "Message-ID:" msg-id CRLF
>
> in-reply-to = "In-Reply-To:" 1*msg-id CRLF
>
> references = "References:" 1*msg-id CRLF
I can imagine if consider CFWS, patchew should probably just work (I can fix
that), but it's still good to understand this.
Fam
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] qapi: merge QInt and QFloat in QNum, Marc-André Lureau, 2017/05/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] qapi: merge QInt and QFloat in QNum, Markus Armbruster, 2017/05/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] qapi: merge QInt and QFloat in QNum, Eric Blake, 2017/05/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] qapi: merge QInt and QFloat in QNum, Marc-André Lureau, 2017/05/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] qapi: merge QInt and QFloat in QNum, Eric Blake, 2017/05/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] qapi: merge QInt and QFloat in QNum, Markus Armbruster, 2017/05/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] qapi: merge QInt and QFloat in QNum, Marc-André Lureau, 2017/05/30
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] qapi: merge QInt and QFloat in QNum, Markus Armbruster, 2017/05/12