qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cpus: reset throttle_thread_scheduled after sle


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cpus: reset throttle_thread_scheduled after sleep
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:36:17 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)

* Jason J. Herne (address@hidden) wrote:
> On 05/19/2017 05:29 PM, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> > Currently, the throttle_thread_scheduled flag is reset back to 0 before
> > sleeping (as part of the throttling logic). Given that throttle_timer
> > (well, any timer) may tick with a slight delay, it so happens that under
> > heavy throttling (ie. close or on CPU_THROTTLE_PCT_MAX) the tick may
> > schedule a further cpu_throttle_thread() work item after the flag reset,
> > but before the previous sleep completed. This results on the vCPU thread
> > sleeping continuously for potentially several seconds in a row.
> > 
> > The chances of that happening can be drastically minimised by resetting
> > the flag after the sleep.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Malcolm Crossley <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  cpus.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> > index 516e5cb..f42eebd 100644
> > --- a/cpus.c
> > +++ b/cpus.c
> > @@ -677,9 +677,9 @@ static void cpu_throttle_thread(CPUState *cpu, 
> > run_on_cpu_data opaque)
> >      sleeptime_ns = (long)(throttle_ratio * CPU_THROTTLE_TIMESLICE_NS);
> > 
> >      qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> > -    atomic_set(&cpu->throttle_thread_scheduled, 0);
> >      g_usleep(sleeptime_ns / 1000); /* Convert ns to us for usleep call */
> >      qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> > +    atomic_set(&cpu->throttle_thread_scheduled, 0);
> >  }
> > 
> >  static void cpu_throttle_timer_tick(void *opaque)
> > 
> 
> This seems to make sense to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Jason J. Herne <address@hidden>
> 
> I'm CC'ing Juan, Amit and David as they are all active in the migration area
> and may have
> opinions on this. Juan and David were also reviewers for the original
> series.

The description is interesting and sounds reasonable; it'll be
interesting to see what difference it makes to the autoconverge
behaviour for those workloads that need this level of throttle.

Dave

> -- 
> -- Jason J. Herne (address@hidden)
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]