[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] 答复: Re: [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Process pactkets in t
From: |
wang.yong155 |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] 答复: Re: [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Process pactkets in the IOThread ofthe primary |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:16:21 +0800 (CST) |
>> From: Wang Yong address@hidden
>>
>> Process pactkets in the IOThread which arrived over the socket.
>> we use qio_channel_set_aio_fd_handler to set the handlers on the
>> IOThread AioContext.then the packets from the primary and the secondary
>> are processed in the IOThread.
>> Finally remove the colo-compare thread using the IOThread instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang address@hidden
>> Signed-off-by: Wang address@hidden
>> ---
>> net/colo-compare.c | 133
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> net/colo.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
>> index b0942a4..e3af791 100644
>> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
>> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>> #include "qemu/sockets.h"
>> #include "qapi-visit.h"
>> #include "net/colo.h"
>> +#include "io/channel.h"
>> #include "sysemu/iothread.h"
>>
>> #define TYPE_COLO_COMPARE "colo-compare"
>> @@ -82,11 +83,6 @@ typedef struct CompareState {
>> GQueue conn_list
>> /* hashtable to save connection */
>> GHashTable *connection_track_table
>> - /* compare thread, a thread for each NIC */
>> - QemuThread thread
>> -
>> - GMainContext *worker_context
>> - GMainLoop *compare_loop
>>
>> /*compare iothread*/
>> IOThread *iothread
>> @@ -95,6 +91,14 @@ typedef struct CompareState {
>> QEMUTimer *packet_check_timer
>> } CompareState
>>
>> +typedef struct {
>> + Chardev parent
>> + QIOChannel *ioc /*I/O channel */
>We probably don't want to manipulate char backend's internal io channel.
>All need here is to access the frontend API (char-fe.c) I believe, and
>hide the internal implementation.
char-fd.c ?
These API can only watch events in the qemu main thread, not in the IOThread.
I had to use the qio_channel_socket_set_aio_fd_handler function to
monitor the char event in the IOThread,so the io channel is used here.
->qio_channel_socket_set_aio_fd_handler
->aio_set_fd_handler
Thanks
>> +} CompareChardev
>> +
>> +#define COMPARE_CHARDEV(obj) \
>> + OBJECT_CHECK(CompareChardev, (obj), TYPE_CHARDEV_SOCKET)
>> +
>> typedef struct CompareClass {
>> ObjectClass parent_class
>> } CompareClass
>> @@ -107,6 +111,12 @@ enum {
>> static int compare_chr_send(CharBackend *out,
>> const uint8_t *buf,
>> uint32_t size)
>> +static void compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(CharBackend *b,
>> + AioContext *ctx,
>> + IOCanReadHandler *fd_can_read,
>> + IOReadHandler *fd_read,
>> + IOEventHandler *fd_event,
>> + void *opaque)
>>
>> static gint seq_sorter(Packet *a, Packet *b, gpointer data)
>> {
>> @@ -534,6 +544,30 @@ err:
>> return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO
>> }
>>
>> +static void compare_chr_read(void *opaque)
>> +{
>> + Chardev *chr = opaque
>> + uint8_t buf[CHR_READ_BUF_LEN]
>> + int len, size
>> + int max_size
>> +
>> + max_size = qemu_chr_be_can_write(chr)
>> + if (max_size <= 0) {
>> + return
>> + }
>> +
>> + len = sizeof(buf)
>> + if (len > max_size) {
>> + len = max_size
>> + }
>> + size = CHARDEV_GET_CLASS(chr)->chr_sync_read(chr, (void *)buf, len)
>> + if (size == 0) {
>> + return
>> + } else if (size > 0) {
>> + qemu_chr_be_write(chr, buf, size)
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static int compare_chr_can_read(void *opaque)
>> {
>> return COMPARE_READ_LEN_MAX
>> @@ -550,8 +584,8 @@ static void compare_pri_chr_in(void *opaque, const
uint8_t *buf, int size)
>>
>> ret = net_fill_rstate(&s->pri_rs, buf, size)
>> if (ret == -1) {
>> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>> - NULL, NULL, true)
>> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, s->ctx,
>> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)
>> error_report("colo-compare primary_in error")
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -567,8 +601,8 @@ static void compare_sec_chr_in(void *opaque, const
uint8_t *buf, int size)
>>
>> ret = net_fill_rstate(&s->sec_rs, buf, size)
>> if (ret == -1) {
>> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>> - NULL, NULL, true)
>> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, s->ctx,
>> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)
>> error_report("colo-compare secondary_in error")
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -605,34 +639,57 @@ static void colo_compare_timer_del(CompareState *s)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static void *colo_compare_thread(void *opaque)
>> -{
>> - CompareState *s = opaque
>> -
>> - s->worker_context = g_main_context_new()
>> -
>> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, compare_chr_can_read,
>> - compare_pri_chr_in, NULL, s, s->worker_context,
true)
>> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, compare_chr_can_read,
>> - compare_sec_chr_in, NULL, s, s->worker_context,
true)
>> -
>> - s->compare_loop = g_main_loop_new(s->worker_context, FALSE)
>> -
>> - g_main_loop_run(s->compare_loop)
>> -
>> - g_main_loop_unref(s->compare_loop)
>> - g_main_context_unref(s->worker_context)
>> - return NULL
>> -}
>>
>> static void colo_compare_iothread(CompareState *s)
>> {
>> object_ref(OBJECT(s->iothread))
>> s->ctx = iothread_get_aio_context(s->iothread)
>>
>> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, s->ctx,
>> + compare_chr_can_read,
>> + compare_pri_chr_in,
>> + NULL,
>> + s)
>> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, s->ctx,
>> + compare_chr_can_read,
>> + compare_sec_chr_in,
>> + NULL,
>> + s)
>> +
>> colo_compare_timer_init(s)
>> }
>>
>> +static void compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(CharBackend *b,
>> + AioContext *ctx,
>> + IOCanReadHandler *fd_can_read,
>> + IOReadHandler *fd_read,
>> + IOEventHandler *fd_event,
>> + void *opaque)
>> +{
>> + CompareChardev *s
>> +
>> + if (!b->chr) {
>> + return
>> + }
>> + s = COMPARE_CHARDEV(b->chr)
>> + if (!s->ioc) {
>> + return
>> + }
>So this is hacky, you can refer how vhost-user validate udp socket char
>backend.
I will investigate.
Thanks
>> +
>> + b->chr_can_read = fd_can_read
>> + b->chr_read = fd_read
>> + b->chr_event = fd_event
>> + b->opaque = opaque
>> + remove_fd_in_watch(b->chr)
>> +
>> + if (b->chr_read) {
>> + qio_channel_set_aio_fd_handler(s->ioc, ctx,
>> + compare_chr_read, NULL, b->chr)
>> + } else {
>> + qio_channel_set_aio_fd_handler(s->ioc, ctx, NULL, NULL, NULL)
>So instead of doing such hack, how about passing a AioContext * instead
>of GMainContext * to qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers?
IOThread AioContext ->GSource -> GMainContext is NULL
if we still use the qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers, it will use the qemu main thread'
GMainContext,
then io will still be processed in the qemu main thread.
so I encapsulate a function(compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers) to monitor char fd
in the IOThread.
Thanks
>Thanks
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static char *compare_get_pri_indev(Object *obj, Error **errp)
>> {
>> CompareState *s = COLO_COMPARE(obj)
>> @@ -736,8 +793,6 @@ static void colo_compare_complete(UserCreatable *uc,
Error **errp)
>> {
>> CompareState *s = COLO_COMPARE(uc)
>> Chardev *chr
>> - char thread_name[64]
>> - static int compare_id
>>
>> if (!s->pri_indev || !s->sec_indev || !s->outdev || !s->iothread) {
>> error_setg(errp, "colo compare needs 'primary_in' ,"
>> @@ -776,12 +831,6 @@ static void colo_compare_complete(UserCreatable *uc,
Error **errp)
>> g_free,
>> connection_destroy)
>>
>> - sprintf(thread_name, "colo-compare %d", compare_id)
>> - qemu_thread_create(&s->thread, thread_name,
>> - colo_compare_thread, s,
>> - QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE)
>> - compare_id++
>> -
>> colo_compare_iothread(s)
>>
>> return
>> @@ -834,16 +883,14 @@ static void colo_compare_finalize(Object *obj)
>> {
>> CompareState *s = COLO_COMPARE(obj)
>>
>> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>> - s->worker_context, true)
>> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>> - s->worker_context, true)
>> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, s->ctx,
>> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)
>> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, s->ctx,
>> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)
>> +
>> qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_out)
>> colo_compare_timer_del(s)
>>
>> - g_main_loop_quit(s->compare_loop)
>> - qemu_thread_join(&s->thread)
>> -
>> /* Release all unhandled packets after compare thead exited */
>> g_queue_foreach(&s->conn_list, colo_flush_packets, s)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/colo.h b/net/colo.h
>> index 7c524f3..936dea1 100644
>> --- a/net/colo.h
>> +++ b/net/colo.h
>> @@ -84,5 +84,6 @@ Connection *connection_get(GHashTable
*connection_track_table,
>> void connection_hashtable_reset(GHashTable *connection_track_table)
>> Packet *packet_new(const void *data, int size)
>> void packet_destroy(void *opaque, void *user_data)
>> +void remove_fd_in_watch(Chardev *chr)
>>
>> #endif /* QEMU_COLO_PROXY_H */
原始邮件
发件人: address@hidden
收件人:王勇10170530 address@hidden address@hidden
抄送人: address@hidden address@hidden
日 期 :2017年06月07日 16:35
主 题 :Re: [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Process pactkets in the IOThread ofthe
primary
On 2017年06月05日 18:44, Yong Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Yong address@hidden
>
> Process pactkets in the IOThread which arrived over the socket.
> we use qio_channel_set_aio_fd_handler to set the handlers on the
> IOThread AioContext.then the packets from the primary and the secondary
> are processed in the IOThread.
> Finally remove the colo-compare thread using the IOThread instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang address@hidden
> Signed-off-by: Wang address@hidden
> ---
> net/colo-compare.c | 133
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> net/colo.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
> index b0942a4..e3af791 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include "qemu/sockets.h"
> #include "qapi-visit.h"
> #include "net/colo.h"
> +#include "io/channel.h"
> #include "sysemu/iothread.h"
>
> #define TYPE_COLO_COMPARE "colo-compare"
> @@ -82,11 +83,6 @@ typedef struct CompareState {
> GQueue conn_list
> /* hashtable to save connection */
> GHashTable *connection_track_table
> - /* compare thread, a thread for each NIC */
> - QemuThread thread
> -
> - GMainContext *worker_context
> - GMainLoop *compare_loop
>
> /*compare iothread*/
> IOThread *iothread
> @@ -95,6 +91,14 @@ typedef struct CompareState {
> QEMUTimer *packet_check_timer
> } CompareState
>
> +typedef struct {
> + Chardev parent
> + QIOChannel *ioc /*I/O channel */
We probably don't want to manipulate char backend's internal io channel.
All need here is to access the frontend API (char-fe.c) I believe, and
hide the internal implementation.
> +} CompareChardev
> +
> +#define COMPARE_CHARDEV(obj) \
> + OBJECT_CHECK(CompareChardev, (obj), TYPE_CHARDEV_SOCKET)
> +
> typedef struct CompareClass {
> ObjectClass parent_class
> } CompareClass
> @@ -107,6 +111,12 @@ enum {
> static int compare_chr_send(CharBackend *out,
> const uint8_t *buf,
> uint32_t size)
> +static void compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(CharBackend *b,
> + AioContext *ctx,
> + IOCanReadHandler *fd_can_read,
> + IOReadHandler *fd_read,
> + IOEventHandler *fd_event,
> + void *opaque)
>
> static gint seq_sorter(Packet *a, Packet *b, gpointer data)
> {
> @@ -534,6 +544,30 @@ err:
> return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO
> }
>
> +static void compare_chr_read(void *opaque)
> +{
> + Chardev *chr = opaque
> + uint8_t buf[CHR_READ_BUF_LEN]
> + int len, size
> + int max_size
> +
> + max_size = qemu_chr_be_can_write(chr)
> + if (max_size <= 0) {
> + return
> + }
> +
> + len = sizeof(buf)
> + if (len > max_size) {
> + len = max_size
> + }
> + size = CHARDEV_GET_CLASS(chr)->chr_sync_read(chr, (void *)buf, len)
> + if (size == 0) {
> + return
> + } else if (size > 0) {
> + qemu_chr_be_write(chr, buf, size)
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int compare_chr_can_read(void *opaque)
> {
> return COMPARE_READ_LEN_MAX
> @@ -550,8 +584,8 @@ static void compare_pri_chr_in(void *opaque, const
uint8_t *buf, int size)
>
> ret = net_fill_rstate(&s->pri_rs, buf, size)
> if (ret == -1) {
> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> - NULL, NULL, true)
> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, s->ctx,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)
> error_report("colo-compare primary_in error")
> }
> }
> @@ -567,8 +601,8 @@ static void compare_sec_chr_in(void *opaque, const
uint8_t *buf, int size)
>
> ret = net_fill_rstate(&s->sec_rs, buf, size)
> if (ret == -1) {
> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> - NULL, NULL, true)
> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, s->ctx,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)
> error_report("colo-compare secondary_in error")
> }
> }
> @@ -605,34 +639,57 @@ static void colo_compare_timer_del(CompareState *s)
> }
> }
>
> -static void *colo_compare_thread(void *opaque)
> -{
> - CompareState *s = opaque
> -
> - s->worker_context = g_main_context_new()
> -
> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, compare_chr_can_read,
> - compare_pri_chr_in, NULL, s, s->worker_context,
true)
> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, compare_chr_can_read,
> - compare_sec_chr_in, NULL, s, s->worker_context,
true)
> -
> - s->compare_loop = g_main_loop_new(s->worker_context, FALSE)
> -
> - g_main_loop_run(s->compare_loop)
> -
> - g_main_loop_unref(s->compare_loop)
> - g_main_context_unref(s->worker_context)
> - return NULL
> -}
>
> static void colo_compare_iothread(CompareState *s)
> {
> object_ref(OBJECT(s->iothread))
> s->ctx = iothread_get_aio_context(s->iothread)
>
> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, s->ctx,
> + compare_chr_can_read,
> + compare_pri_chr_in,
> + NULL,
> + s)
> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, s->ctx,
> + compare_chr_can_read,
> + compare_sec_chr_in,
> + NULL,
> + s)
> +
> colo_compare_timer_init(s)
> }
>
> +static void compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(CharBackend *b,
> + AioContext *ctx,
> + IOCanReadHandler *fd_can_read,
> + IOReadHandler *fd_read,
> + IOEventHandler *fd_event,
> + void *opaque)
> +{
> + CompareChardev *s
> +
> + if (!b->chr) {
> + return
> + }
> + s = COMPARE_CHARDEV(b->chr)
> + if (!s->ioc) {
> + return
> + }
So this is hacky, you can refer how vhost-user validate udp socket char
backend.
> +
> + b->chr_can_read = fd_can_read
> + b->chr_read = fd_read
> + b->chr_event = fd_event
> + b->opaque = opaque
> + remove_fd_in_watch(b->chr)
> +
> + if (b->chr_read) {
> + qio_channel_set_aio_fd_handler(s->ioc, ctx,
> + compare_chr_read, NULL, b->chr)
> + } else {
> + qio_channel_set_aio_fd_handler(s->ioc, ctx, NULL, NULL, NULL)
So instead of doing such hack, how about passing a AioContext * instead
of GMainContext * to qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers?
Thanks
> + }
> +}
> +
> static char *compare_get_pri_indev(Object *obj, Error **errp)
> {
> CompareState *s = COLO_COMPARE(obj)
> @@ -736,8 +793,6 @@ static void colo_compare_complete(UserCreatable *uc,
Error **errp)
> {
> CompareState *s = COLO_COMPARE(uc)
> Chardev *chr
> - char thread_name[64]
> - static int compare_id
>
> if (!s->pri_indev || !s->sec_indev || !s->outdev || !s->iothread) {
> error_setg(errp, "colo compare needs 'primary_in' ,"
> @@ -776,12 +831,6 @@ static void colo_compare_complete(UserCreatable *uc,
Error **errp)
> g_free,
> connection_destroy)
>
> - sprintf(thread_name, "colo-compare %d", compare_id)
> - qemu_thread_create(&s->thread, thread_name,
> - colo_compare_thread, s,
> - QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE)
> - compare_id++
> -
> colo_compare_iothread(s)
>
> return
> @@ -834,16 +883,14 @@ static void colo_compare_finalize(Object *obj)
> {
> CompareState *s = COLO_COMPARE(obj)
>
> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> - s->worker_context, true)
> - qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> - s->worker_context, true)
> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_pri_in, s->ctx,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)
> + compare_chr_set_aio_fd_handlers(&s->chr_sec_in, s->ctx,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)
> +
> qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_out)
> colo_compare_timer_del(s)
>
> - g_main_loop_quit(s->compare_loop)
> - qemu_thread_join(&s->thread)
> -
> /* Release all unhandled packets after compare thead exited */
> g_queue_foreach(&s->conn_list, colo_flush_packets, s)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo.h b/net/colo.h
> index 7c524f3..936dea1 100644
> --- a/net/colo.h
> +++ b/net/colo.h
> @@ -84,5 +84,6 @@ Connection *connection_get(GHashTable
*connection_track_table,
> void connection_hashtable_reset(GHashTable *connection_track_table)
> Packet *packet_new(const void *data, int size)
> void packet_destroy(void *opaque, void *user_data)
> +void remove_fd_in_watch(Chardev *chr)
>
> #endif /* QEMU_COLO_PROXY_H */
- [Qemu-devel] 答复: Re: [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Process pactkets in the IOThread ofthe primary,
wang.yong155 <=