qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 07/11] migration: add bitmap for copied page


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 07/11] migration: add bitmap for copied page
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 14:06:17 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:13:00PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 12:46 PM, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> >This patch adds ability to track down already copied
> >pages, it's necessary for calculation vCPU block time in
> >postcopy migration feature, maybe for restore after
> >postcopy migration failure.
> >Also it's necessary to solve shared memory issue in
> >postcopy livemigration. Information about copied pages
> >will be transferred to the software virtual bridge
> >(e.g. OVS-VSWITCHD), to avoid fallocate (unmap) for
> >already copied pages. fallocate syscall is required for
> >remmaped shared memory, due to remmaping itself blocks
> >ioctl(UFFDIO_COPY, ioctl in this case will end with EEXIT
> >error (struct page is exists after remmap).
> >
> >Bitmap is placed into RAMBlock as another postcopy/precopy
> >related bitmaps. Helpers are in migration/ram.c, due to
> >in this file is allowing to work with RAMBlock.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <address@hidden>
> >---
> >  include/exec/ram_addr.h |  2 ++
> >  migration/ram.c         | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  migration/ram.h         |  4 ++++
> >  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
> >index 140efa8..6a3780b 100644
> >--- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
> >+++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
> >@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct RAMBlock {
> >       * of the postcopy phase
> >       */
> >      unsigned long *unsentmap;
> >+    /* bitmap of already copied pages in postcopy */
> >+    unsigned long *copiedmap;
> >  };
> >  static inline bool offset_in_ramblock(RAMBlock *b, ram_addr_t offset)
> >diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> >index f387e9c..a7c0db4 100644
> >--- a/migration/ram.c
> >+++ b/migration/ram.c
> >@@ -149,6 +149,25 @@ out:
> >      return ret;
> >  }
> >+static unsigned long int get_copied_bit_offset(uint64_t addr, RAMBlock *rb)
> >+{
> >+    uint64_t addr_offset = addr - (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)rb->host;
> >+    int page_shift = find_first_bit((unsigned long *)&rb->page_size,
> >+                                    sizeof(rb->page_size));
> >+
> >+    return addr_offset >> page_shift;
> >+}
> >+
> >+int test_copiedmap_by_addr(uint64_t addr, RAMBlock *rb)
> >+{
> >+    return test_bit(get_copied_bit_offset(addr, rb), rb->copiedmap);
> >+}
> >+
> >+void set_copiedmap_by_addr(uint64_t addr, RAMBlock *rb)
> >+{
> >+    set_bit_atomic(get_copied_bit_offset(addr, rb), rb->copiedmap);
> >+}
> >+
> >  /*
> >   * An outstanding page request, on the source, having been received
> >   * and queued
> >@@ -1449,6 +1468,8 @@ static void ram_migration_cleanup(void *opaque)
> >          block->bmap = NULL;
> >          g_free(block->unsentmap);
> >          block->unsentmap = NULL;
> looks like it's wrong place, because copiedmap is living
> on destination side, so maybe in qemu_ram_free

Yes, and...

> >+        g_free(block->copiedmap);
> >+        block->copiedmap = NULL;
> >      }
> >      XBZRLE_cache_lock();
> >@@ -2517,6 +2538,14 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> >      return ret;
> >  }
> >+static unsigned long get_copiedmap_size(RAMBlock *rb)
> >+{
> >+    unsigned long pages;
> >+    pages = rb->max_length >> find_first_bit((unsigned long 
> >*)&rb->page_size,
> >+                                             sizeof(rb->page_size));
> >+    return pages;
> >+}
> >+
> >  static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
> >  {
> >      int flags = 0, ret = 0;
> >@@ -2544,6 +2573,13 @@ static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int 
> >version_id)
> >      rcu_read_lock();
> >      if (postcopy_running) {
> >+        RAMBlock *rb;
> >+        RAMBLOCK_FOREACH(rb) {
> >+            /* need for destination, bitmap_new calls
> >+             * g_try_malloc0 and this function
> >+             * Attempts to allocate @n_bytes, initialized to 0'sh */
> >+            rb->copiedmap = bitmap_new(get_copiedmap_size(rb));

... I'm not sure whether this is the right place to init the bitmap,
since iiuc ram_load() can be entered multiple times?

Also, I think we need the bitmap even before the first page we send
during precopy, right?

I would think loadvm_postcopy_handle_advise() somewhere proper: that
is before the first page is sent, and also when we are there it means
source wants to do postcopy finally.

Thanks,

> >+        }
> >          ret = ram_load_postcopy(f);
> >      }
> >diff --git a/migration/ram.h b/migration/ram.h
> >index c9563d1..1f32824 100644
> >--- a/migration/ram.h
> >+++ b/migration/ram.h
> >@@ -67,4 +67,8 @@ int ram_discard_range(const char *block_name, uint64_t 
> >start, size_t length);
> >  int ram_postcopy_incoming_init(MigrationIncomingState *mis);
> >  void ram_handle_compressed(void *host, uint8_t ch, uint64_t size);
> >+
> >+int test_copiedmap_by_addr(uint64_t addr, RAMBlock *rb);
> >+void set_copiedmap_by_addr(uint64_t addr, RAMBlock *rb);
> >+
> >  #endif
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Alexey Perevalov

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]