Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] migration: Test for disabled features on reception

[Juan Quintela]

"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden> wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (address@hidden) wrote:
>> Right now, if we receive a compressed page while this features are
>> disabled, Bad Things (TM) can happen.  Just add a test for them.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
>
> Yes, my R-b stands, there could be someone somewhere driving this by
> hand who might get caught out, but seems saner this way.
>
>> --
>> 
>> I had XBZRLE here also, but it don't need extra resources on
>> destination, only on source.  Additionally libvirt don't enable it on
>> destination, so don't put it here.
>> ---
>>  migration/ram.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
>> index f35d65a..f2d1bce 100644
>> --- a/migration/ram.c
>> +++ b/migration/ram.c
>> @@ -2477,7 +2477,7 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
>>  
>>  static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
>>  {
>> -    int flags = 0, ret = 0;
>> +    int flags = 0, ret = 0, invalid_flags;
>>      static uint64_t seq_iter;
>>      int len = 0;
>>      /*
>> @@ -2494,6 +2494,11 @@ static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int 
>> version_id)
>>          ret = -EINVAL;
>>      }
>>  
>> +    invalid_flags = 0;
>
> why didn't you use = 0 in the declaration like the rest of the flags?
> (Only minor)

Costume :-(

Changed to common style there.

Thanks, Juan.