qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] MAINTAINERS: add Dump maintainers


From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] MAINTAINERS: add Dump maintainers
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 12:17:17 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 07/06/17 11:54, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 06/29/17 15:23, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>>> Proposing myself, since I have some familiarity with the code now.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 839f7ca063..45a0eb4cb0 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -1272,6 +1272,13 @@ S: Maintained
>>>  F: device_tree.c
>>>  F: include/sysemu/device_tree.h
>>>  
>>> +Dump
>>> +S: Supported
>>> +M: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
>>> +F: dump.c
>>> +F: include/sysemu/dump.h
>>> +F: include/sysemu/dump-arch.h
>>> +
>>>  Error reporting
>>>  M: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>>>  S: Supported
>>>
>>
>> That's very kind of you, thanks!
>>
>> Do you have suggestions for the following files?
>>
>> scripts/dump-guest-memory.py
> 
> This one is yours, no? :) But I am ok to "support" it, meaning I'll take time 
> to review the patches, and eventually make the pull-requests.

It used to be "mine" until (a) it got rewritten in object-oriented
Python, and (b) it received multi-arch support ;)

>  
>> stubs/dump.c
> 
> I can add that one, although it is also maintained by Paolo
> 
>> target/arm/arch_dump.c
>> target/i386/arch_dump.c
>> target/ppc/arch_dump.c
>> target/s390x/arch_dump.c
> 
> I'd rather have those maintained by the respective arch maintainers, as they 
> are. But I imagine it would make sense to also cover them with the rest of 
> dump.

Yeah there's an overlap here -- I'm not suggesting that you take on
everything, just curious what you think. I'm fine with this patch as it is.

Thanks
Laszlo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]