Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:35:21PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Q1: In the worst case, you get four individual auto replies from patchew. Is
> that too many? Do you prefer one reply with all the results concatenated into
> one?

I'd like to avoid situations where one of the failure emails is sent
hours after the others, because it's possible that the patch series
author has already sent the next (still broken) revision by that time.
The simplest way to avoid that is by sending just one email.

> Q2: Some think the full log in the mail body is more than necessary. Is it
> better or worse if it is a "tail -n 200" of the log in the body and the full 
> log
> attached?

tail output and a link to the full logs would be nice.  Often there is a
lot of irrelevant output.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature