qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/26] ppc/xive: introduce a skeleton for th


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/26] ppc/xive: introduce a skeleton for the XIVE interrupt controller model
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:25:43 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 02:18:17PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 14:01 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:56:57PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 13:08 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:13:17PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > > > Let's provide an empty shell for the XIVE controller model with a
> > > > > couple of attributes for the IRQ number allocator. The latter is
> > > > > largely inspired by OPAL which allocates IPI IRQ numbers from the
> > > > > bottom of the IRQ number space and allocates the HW IRQ numbers from
> > > > > the top.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The number of IPIs is simply deduced from the max number of CPUs the
> > > > > guest supports and we provision a arbitrary number of HW irqs.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The XIVE object is kept private because it will hold internal tables
> > > > > which do not need to be exposed to sPAPR.
> > > 
> > > It does have an MMIO presence though... more than one even. There's the
> > > TIMA (per-HW thread control area) and there's the per-interrupt MMIO
> > > space which are exposed to the guest. There's also the per-queue
> > > MMIO control area too.
> > 
> > Ok.  Always?  Or just on powernv?
> > 
> > If it only has an MMIO presence on powernv, then the "core" xive
> > object should probably be TYPE_DEVICE, with the powernv specific
> > device being a SysBusDevice which incorporates the core xive device
> > inside it.
> 
> No the ones above are on PAPR. PowerNV has even more :-)

Ok.  SusBusDevice is reasonable then.

> The TIMA (thread management area) is the MMIO area through which
> you control the current CPU priority etc...
> 
> It's designed in HW to "know" which core/thread is accessing it (it's
> at a fixed address) and respond appropriately based on that and which
> virtual CPU has been activated on that core/thread.
> 
> It's part of what allows XIVE to deliver interrupts without any HV
> calls.
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]