qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] [PATCH] hmp: dump ids includingsocket-id, c


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] [PATCH] hmp: dump ids includingsocket-id, core-id and so on for 'info registers'
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:52:40 -0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:07:45PM +0800, address@hidden wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2017 03:38:55 -0400
> > Yi Wang <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > This patch add output of CPUs' socket-id, core-id, thread-id and
> > > apic-id for 'info registers', which can be used for querying other
> > > hmp commands.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <address@hidden>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yun Liu <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  include/qom/cpu.h    | 12 ++++++++++++
> > >  monitor.c            |  1 +
> > >  qom/cpu.c            | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  target/i386/cpu.c    |  1 +
> > >  target/i386/cpu.h    |  1 +
> > >  target/i386/helper.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > >  6 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/qom/cpu.h b/include/qom/cpu.h
> > > index 25eefea..4717bd7 100644
> > > --- a/include/qom/cpu.h
> > > +++ b/include/qom/cpu.h
> > > @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct TranslationBlock
> > >   * CPUs can use the default implementation of this method. This method 
> > > should
> > >   * not be used by any callers other than the pre-1.0 virtio devices.
> > >   * @memory_rw_debug: Callback for GDB memory access.
> > > + * @dump_ids: Callback for dumping ids.
> > >   * @dump_state: Callback for dumping state.
> > >   * @dump_statistics: Callback for dumping statistics.
> > >   * @get_arch_id: Callback for getting architecture-dependent CPU ID.
> > > @@ -156,6 +157,7 @@ typedef struct CPUClass {
> > >      bool (*virtio_is_big_endian)(CPUState *cpu)
> > >      int (*memory_rw_debug)(CPUState *cpu, vaddr addr,
> > >                             uint8_t *buf, int len, bool is_write)
> > > +    void (*dump_ids)(CPUState *cpu, FILE *f, fprintf_function 
> > > cpu_fprintf)
> > >      void (*dump_state)(CPUState *cpu, FILE *f, fprintf_function 
> > > cpu_fprintf,
> > >                         int flags)
> > >      GuestPanicInformation* (*get_crash_info)(CPUState *cpu)
> > > @@ -518,6 +520,16 @@ enum CPUDumpFlags {
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /**
> > > + * cpu_dump_ids:
> > > + * @cpu: The CPU whose state is to be dumped.
> > > + * @f: File to dump to.
> > > + * @cpu_fprintf: Function to dump with.
> > > + *
> > > + * Dumps CPU socket-id, core-id, thread-id and apic-id.
> > > + */
> > > +void cpu_dump_ids(CPUState *cpu, FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf)
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > >   * cpu_dump_state:
> > >   * @cpu: The CPU whose state is to be dumped.
> > >   * @f: File to dump to.
> > > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> > > index 6d040e6..30f898c 100644
> > > --- a/monitor.c
> > > +++ b/monitor.c
> > > @@ -1085,6 +1085,7 @@ static void hmp_info_registers(Monitor *mon, const 
> > > QDict *qdict)
> > >      if (all_cpus) {
> > >          CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
> > >              monitor_printf(mon, "\nCPU#%d\n", cs->cpu_index)
> > > +            cpu_dump_ids(cs, (FILE *)mon, monitor_fprintf)
> > >              cpu_dump_state(cs, (FILE *)mon, monitor_fprintf, 
> > > CPU_DUMP_FPU)
> > >          }
> > >      } else {
> > > diff --git a/qom/cpu.c b/qom/cpu.c
> > > index 4f38db0..a9df661 100644
> > > --- a/qom/cpu.c
> > > +++ b/qom/cpu.c
> > > @@ -242,6 +242,16 @@ GuestPanicInformation *cpu_get_crash_info(CPUState 
> > > *cpu)
> > >      return res
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +void cpu_dump_ids(CPUState *cpu, FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf)
> > > +{
> > > +    CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu)
> > > +
> > > +    if (cc->dump_ids) {
> > > +        cpu_synchronize_state(cpu)
> > > +        cc->dump_ids(cpu, f, cpu_fprintf)
> > > +    }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  void cpu_dump_state(CPUState *cpu, FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf,
> > >                      int flags)
> > >  {
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > index 0bbda76..0aa488f 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > @@ -4120,6 +4120,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_common_class_init(ObjectClass 
> > > *oc, void *data)
> > >      cc->do_interrupt = x86_cpu_do_interrupt
> > >      cc->cpu_exec_interrupt = x86_cpu_exec_interrupt
> > >  #endif
> > > +    cc->dump_ids = x86_cpu_dump_ids
> > >      cc->dump_state = x86_cpu_dump_state
> > >      cc->get_crash_info = x86_cpu_get_crash_info
> > >      cc->set_pc = x86_cpu_set_pc
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> > > index 0518673..31ad681 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> > > @@ -1316,6 +1316,7 @@ int 
> > > x86_cpu_write_elf32_qemunote(WriteCoreDumpFunction f, CPUState *cpu,
> > >  void x86_cpu_get_memory_mapping(CPUState *cpu, MemoryMappingList *list,
> > >                                  Error **errp)
> > >  
> > > +void x86_cpu_dump_ids(CPUState *cs, FILE *f, fprintf_function 
> > > cpu_fprintf)
> > >  void x86_cpu_dump_state(CPUState *cs, FILE *f, fprintf_function 
> > > cpu_fprintf,
> > >                          int flags)
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/helper.c b/target/i386/helper.c
> > > index f63eb3d..fd4f1af 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/helper.c
> > > +++ b/target/i386/helper.c
> > > @@ -408,6 +408,19 @@ void x86_cpu_dump_local_apic_state(CPUState *cs, 
> > > FILE *f,
> > >  #define DUMP_CODE_BYTES_TOTAL    50
> > >  #define DUMP_CODE_BYTES_BACKWARD 20
> > >  
> > > +void x86_cpu_dump_ids(CPUState *cs, FILE *f, fprintf_function 
> > > cpu_fprintf)
> > > +{
> > > +    X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs)
> > > +    APICCommonState *s = APIC_COMMON(cpu->apic_state)
> > > +    if (!s) {
> > > +        cpu_fprintf(f, "local apic state not available\n")
> > > +        return
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    cpu_fprintf(f, "(socket-id:%d core-id:%d thread-id:%d apic-id:%d)\n",
> > > +            cpu->socket_id, cpu->core_id, cpu->thread_id, s->id)
> > 
> > I'd move this hunk into x86_cpu_dump_state() and drop the rest of the patch.
> > 
> > If we'd need to generalize it for other targets, we could do it later.
> 
> Thanks, Igor.
> Should I rework this patch as you said above and send it with the other 
> [PATCH 2/2]
> as a entire series then? If no, I will resend the new version of [PATCH 2/2] 
> only :)

I suggest redoing this patch too, as moving the code to
x86_cpu_dump_state() like he suggests would make the patch much
simpler.

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]