qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 19/22] libqtest: Add qmp_args_dict() helper


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 19/22] libqtest: Add qmp_args_dict() helper
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:41:56 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 08/09/2017 10:59 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Leaving interpolation into JSON to qobject_from_jsonf() is more
>> robust than building QMP input manually; however, we have a few
>> places where code is already creating a QDict to interpolate
>> individual arguments, which cannot be reproduced with the
>> qobject_from_jsonf() parser.  Expose a public wrapper
>> qmp_args_dict() for the internal helper qmp_args_dict_async()
>> that we needed earlier for qmp_args(), and fix a test to use
>> the new helper.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>> ---

>> +++ b/tests/device-introspect-test.c
>> @@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ static QList *qom_list_types(const char *implements, bool 
>> abstract)
>>      if (implements) {
>>          qdict_put_str(args, "implements", implements);
>>      }
>> -    resp = qmp("{'execute': 'qom-list-types',"
>> -               " 'arguments': %p }", args);
>> +    resp = qmp_args_dict("qom-list-types", args);
>>      g_assert(qdict_haskey(resp, "return"));
>>      ret = qdict_get_qlist(resp, "return");
>>      QINCREF(ret);
> 
> If we had five of these, the helper would be worth its keep.

This patch only  has one client, but 20/22 adds another.  Is having 2
clients sufficient to keep it (not quite the 5 that makes it obvious,
but still a good reuse of code)?

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]