qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] boot-serial-test: fallback to kvm accelerato


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] boot-serial-test: fallback to kvm accelerator
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:35:10 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 11/08/2017 15:34, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:29:53 +0100
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 03:18:01PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> Currently, at least x86_64 and s390x support building with --disable-tcg.
>>> Instead of forcing tcg (which causes the test to fail on such builds),
>>> allow to use kvm as well.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v1->v2: switch around kvm and tcg
>>>
>>> Added Paolo on cc:; I can still take this through the s390x tree, though.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  tests/boot-serial-test.c | 3 ++-
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/boot-serial-test.c b/tests/boot-serial-test.c
>>> index 11f48b049c..78303b14ce 100644
>>> --- a/tests/boot-serial-test.c
>>> +++ b/tests/boot-serial-test.c
>>> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static void test_machine(const void *data)
>>>      fd = mkstemp(tmpname);
>>>      g_assert(fd != -1);
>>>  
>>> -    args = g_strdup_printf("-M %s,accel=tcg -chardev 
>>> file,id=serial0,path=%s"
>>> +    args = g_strdup_printf("-M %s,accel=kvm:tcg "
>>> +                           "-chardev file,id=serial0,path=%s"
>>>                             " -no-shutdown -serial chardev:serial0 %s",
>>>                             test->machine, tmpname, test->extra);  
>>
>> Total nit-pick - the first line has a trailing ' ', while the second
>> line has no leading or trailing ' ', and the third line has a leading
>> ' '. The inconsistency bugs me - suggest using trailing ' ' in both
>> lines.
> 
> Yes, I prefer trailing ' ' as well, just did not want to touch more
> lines than necessary.

Go ahead and fix it + send the pull request yourself.

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]