qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/arm: Correct load/store exclusive pairin


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/arm: Correct load/store exclusive pairing and alignment
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:23:01 -0700

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Richard Henderson <address@hidden> wrote:
> SetExclusiveMonitors in the pseudocode is on the address + width,
> and says nothing about the manner of the load.  Therefore
>
>         ldxp    w0, w1, [x2]
> vs
>         ldxr    x0, [x2]
>
> must record the same metadata so that either may pair with
>
>         stxp    w3, w0, w1, [x2]
> vs
>         stxr    w3, x0, [x2]
>
> Fix this by ignoring cpu_exclusive_high except for 64-bit LDXP/STXP.
>
> Also note that we were not providing the required single-copy atomic
> semantics for 32-bit LDXP.  This is trivially fixed alongside the
> cpu_exclusive_val change.
>
> At the same time, exclusive loads require the same alignment as
> exclusive stores.  For 64-bit LDXP, this means adding MO_ALIGN_16;
> for the others adding MO_ALIGN.
>
> Reported-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>

This passes the same tests that my patch series passes.

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
Tested-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>

Thanks,
Alistair


> ---
>  target/arm/translate-a64.c | 65 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> ---
>
> I have not yet constructed test cases for all of the combinations
> listed above.  I wanted to put this into your hands so that you could
> test against your existing code using LDXP/STXP.
>
>
> r~
>
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> index 58ed4c6d05..f3643ac8dc 100644
> --- a/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> @@ -1853,29 +1853,45 @@ static void disas_b_exc_sys(DisasContext *s, uint32_t 
> insn)
>  static void gen_load_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rt, int rt2,
>                                 TCGv_i64 addr, int size, bool is_pair)
>  {
> -    TCGv_i64 tmp = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -    TCGMemOp memop = s->be_data + size;
> +    int idx = get_mem_index(s);
> +    TCGMemOp memop = s->be_data;
>
>      g_assert(size <= 3);
> -    tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(tmp, addr, get_mem_index(s), memop);
> -
>      if (is_pair) {
> -        TCGv_i64 addr2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -        TCGv_i64 hitmp = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -
>          g_assert(size >= 2);
> -        tcg_gen_addi_i64(addr2, addr, 1 << size);
> -        tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(hitmp, addr2, get_mem_index(s), memop);
> -        tcg_temp_free_i64(addr2);
> -        tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_exclusive_high, hitmp);
> -        tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt2), hitmp);
> -        tcg_temp_free_i64(hitmp);
> -    }
> +        if (size == 2) {
> +            /* The pair must be single-copy atomic for the doubleword.  */
> +            memop |= MO_64 | MO_ALIGN;
> +            tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(cpu_exclusive_val, addr, idx, memop);
> +            if (s->be_data == MO_LE) {
> +                tcg_gen_extract_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt), cpu_exclusive_val, 0, 
> 32);
> +                tcg_gen_extract_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt2), cpu_exclusive_val, 32, 
> 32);
> +            } else {
> +                tcg_gen_extract_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt), cpu_exclusive_val, 32, 
> 32);
> +                tcg_gen_extract_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt2), cpu_exclusive_val, 0, 
> 32);
> +            }
> +        } else {
> +            /* The pair must be single-copy atomic for *each* doubleword,
> +               but not the entire quadword.  It must, however, be aligned.  
> */
> +            TCGv_i64 addr2;
>
> -    tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_exclusive_val, tmp);
> -    tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt), tmp);
> +            memop |= MO_64;
> +            tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(cpu_exclusive_val, addr, idx,
> +                                memop | MO_ALIGN_16);
>
> -    tcg_temp_free_i64(tmp);
> +            addr2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> +            tcg_gen_addi_i64(addr2, addr, 8);
> +            tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(cpu_exclusive_high, addr2, idx, memop);
> +            tcg_temp_free_i64(addr2);
> +
> +            tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt), cpu_exclusive_val);
> +            tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt2), cpu_exclusive_high);
> +        }
> +    } else {
> +        memop |= size | MO_ALIGN;
> +        tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(cpu_exclusive_val, addr, idx, memop);
> +        tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_reg(s, rt), cpu_exclusive_val);
> +    }
>      tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_exclusive_addr, addr);
>  }
>
> @@ -1908,14 +1924,15 @@ static void gen_store_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int 
> rd, int rt, int rt2,
>      tmp = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>      if (is_pair) {
>          if (size == 2) {
> -            TCGv_i64 val = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -            tcg_gen_concat32_i64(tmp, cpu_reg(s, rt), cpu_reg(s, rt2));
> -            tcg_gen_concat32_i64(val, cpu_exclusive_val, cpu_exclusive_high);
> -            tcg_gen_atomic_cmpxchg_i64(tmp, addr, val, tmp,
> +            if (s->be_data == MO_LE) {
> +                tcg_gen_concat32_i64(tmp, cpu_reg(s, rt), cpu_reg(s, rt2));
> +            } else {
> +                tcg_gen_concat32_i64(tmp, cpu_reg(s, rt2), cpu_reg(s, rt));
> +            }
> +            tcg_gen_atomic_cmpxchg_i64(tmp, addr, cpu_exclusive_val, tmp,
>                                         get_mem_index(s),
> -                                       size | MO_ALIGN | s->be_data);
> -            tcg_gen_setcond_i64(TCG_COND_NE, tmp, tmp, val);
> -            tcg_temp_free_i64(val);
> +                                       MO_64 | MO_ALIGN | s->be_data);
> +            tcg_gen_setcond_i64(TCG_COND_NE, tmp, tmp, cpu_exclusive_val);
>          } else if (s->be_data == MO_LE) {
>              gen_helper_paired_cmpxchg64_le(tmp, cpu_env, addr, cpu_reg(s, 
> rt),
>                                             cpu_reg(s, rt2));
> --
> 2.13.4
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]