qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/15] ppc4xx: Add more PLB registers


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/15] ppc4xx: Add more PLB registers
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:28:15 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (BSF 202 2017-01-01)

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:16:24PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, David Gibson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 07:23:05PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
These registers are present in 440 SoCs (and maybe in others too) and
U-Boot accesses them when printing register info. We don't emulate
these but add them to avoid crashing when they are read or written.

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden>

I'm ok with stub implementation, but I'm a bit uncomfortable with
registering these DCRs unconditionally rather than just on the chips
that actually implement them.

Problem is that I don't know which chips have these. I can only try to find
out from the U-Boot sources where a comment says these are common registers
for all SoCs (in u-boot/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc4xx.h:

http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc4xx.h;h=45ff5dbacd9243e83bb2f6551e2dd64a7e544bf5;hb=e2351d5cf1e97408b4c52bafeaa85e0ca85c920c

while looking for this I've just noticed that u-boot has removed ppc440
support just before 2017.07-rc3 so this is the last version that still has
these files). So if that's true it should be OK for 405 too.

Ok, just to make sure I'm understanding correctly are you saying:

1) You suspect these registers were actually on all versions of the
  device, they just weren't implemented until now.

That's what I suspect from the comment in the file quoted above but I don't have any other evidence.

or

2) The registers are definitely on only some versions of the device,
  but you're not sure which ones

I don't know any of these devices very well and have no definitive sources to confirm so I'm not sure but I think these should be on all the versions (at least on all three that QEMU emulates, namely 405, 440 and 460ex).

---
 hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c b/hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c
index e621d0a..8e58065 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c
@@ -105,9 +105,12 @@ ram_addr_t ppc405_set_bootinfo (CPUPPCState *env, 
ppc4xx_bd_info_t *bd,
 /*****************************************************************************/
 /* Peripheral local bus arbitrer */
 enum {
-    PLB0_BESR = 0x084,
-    PLB0_BEAR = 0x086,
-    PLB0_ACR  = 0x087,
+    PLB3A0_ACR = 0x077,
+    PLB4A0_ACR = 0x081,
+    PLB0_BESR  = 0x084,
+    PLB0_BEAR  = 0x086,
+    PLB0_ACR   = 0x087,
+    PLB4A1_ACR = 0x089,
 };

 typedef struct ppc4xx_plb_t ppc4xx_plb_t;
@@ -179,9 +182,12 @@ void ppc4xx_plb_init(CPUPPCState *env)
     ppc4xx_plb_t *plb;

     plb = g_malloc0(sizeof(ppc4xx_plb_t));
+    ppc_dcr_register(env, PLB3A0_ACR, plb, &dcr_read_plb, &dcr_write_plb);
+    ppc_dcr_register(env, PLB4A0_ACR, plb, &dcr_read_plb, &dcr_write_plb);
     ppc_dcr_register(env, PLB0_ACR, plb, &dcr_read_plb, &dcr_write_plb);
     ppc_dcr_register(env, PLB0_BEAR, plb, &dcr_read_plb, &dcr_write_plb);
     ppc_dcr_register(env, PLB0_BESR, plb, &dcr_read_plb, &dcr_write_plb);
+    ppc_dcr_register(env, PLB4A1_ACR, plb, &dcr_read_plb, &dcr_write_plb);
     qemu_register_reset(ppc4xx_plb_reset, plb);
 }









reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]