qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/21] target/s390x: rename next_cpu_id to ne


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/21] target/s390x: rename next_cpu_id to next_core_id
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:09:47 +0200

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:21:43 +0200
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:

> Adapt to the new term "core_id". While at it, fix the type and drop the
> initialization to 0 (which is superfluous).
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/s390x/cpu-qom.h |  2 +-
>  target/s390x/cpu.c     | 11 +++++------
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
> index 2435cd8390..2e446fab51 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu-qom.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ typedef struct S390CPUClass {
>      bool is_migration_safe;
>      const char *desc;
>  
> -    int64_t next_cpu_id;
> +    uint32_t next_core_id;
is it possible to hotplug cpus in out of order in real hw?

>  
>      DeviceRealize parent_realize;
>      void (*parent_reset)(CPUState *cpu);
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> index 87ebbe5b28..8c1c644057 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>      }
>  #else
>      /* implicitly set for linux-user only */
> -    cpu->env.core_id = scc->next_cpu_id;
> +    cpu->env.core_id = scc->next_core_id;
>  #endif
>  
>      if (cpu_exists(cpu->env.core_id)) {
> @@ -206,10 +206,10 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>                     ", it already exists", cpu->env.core_id);
>          goto out;
>      }
> -    if (cpu->env.core_id != scc->next_cpu_id) {
> +    if (cpu->env.core_id != scc->next_core_id) {
>          error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU with core-id: %" PRIu32
> -                   ", the next available core-id is %" PRIi64, 
> cpu->env.core_id,
> -                   scc->next_cpu_id);
> +                   ", the next available core-id is %" PRIu32, 
> cpu->env.core_id,
> +                   scc->next_core_id);
>          goto out;
>      }
>  
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>      if (err != NULL) {
>          goto out;
>      }
> -    scc->next_cpu_id++;
> +    scc->next_core_id++;
>  
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>      qemu_register_reset(s390_cpu_machine_reset_cb, cpu);
> @@ -464,7 +464,6 @@ static void s390_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void 
> *data)
>      CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(scc);
>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>  
> -    scc->next_cpu_id = 0;
>      scc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
>      dc->realize = s390_cpu_realizefn;
>      dc->props = s390x_cpu_properties;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]