qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 15/19] migration: Create thread infrastructur


From: Juan Quintela
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 15/19] migration: Create thread infrastructure for multifd recv side
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:26:07 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

"Daniel P. Berrange" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 06:26:25PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> We make the locking and the transfer of information specific, even if we
>> are still receiving things through the main thread.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <address@hidden>
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> We split when we create the main channel and where we start the main
>> migration thread, so we wait for the creation of the other threads.
>> 
>> Use multifd_clear_group().
>> ---
>>  migration/migration.c |  7 ++++---
>>  migration/migration.h |  1 +
>>  migration/ram.c       | 55 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  migration/socket.c    |  2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>
>> diff --git a/migration/socket.c b/migration/socket.c
>> index 5dd6f42..3af9f7c 100644
>> --- a/migration/socket.c
>> +++ b/migration/socket.c
>> @@ -183,12 +183,12 @@ static gboolean
>> socket_accept_incoming_migration(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>  
>>      qio_channel_set_name(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), "migration-socket-incoming");
>>      migration_channel_process_incoming(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc));
>> -    object_unref(OBJECT(sioc));
>
> AFAICT, migration_channel_process_incoming() acquires its own reference
> on 'sioc', so removing this object_unref means the code is now leaking a
> reference

Nack.

I did it and ended with a segmentation fault because reference count was
bad.

(qemu) 
Thread 6 "multifdrecv_0" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fff9f9ff700 (LWP 10065)]
0x00005555559c12f8 in type_is_ancestor (type=0xb60f18247c894860, 
    target_type=0x555556531b30) at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/qom/object.c:217
217         while (type) {
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00005555559c12f8 in type_is_ancestor (type=0xb60f18247c894860, 
target_type=0x555556531b30) at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/qom/object.c:217
#1  0x00005555559c1dbb in object_class_dynamic_cast (address@hidden 
<main_arena+520>, address@hidden "qio-channel")
    at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/qom/object.c:691
#2  0x00005555559c1ed2 in object_class_dynamic_cast_assert 
(class=0x7ffff2cb3ce8 <main_arena+520>, address@hidden "qio-channel", 
address@hidden "/mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/io/channel.c", address@hidden, 
address@hidden <__func__.22671> "qio_channel_readv_full")
    at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/qom/object.c:723
#3  0x0000555555a3d4d7 in qio_channel_readv_full (ioc=0x5555568c5a00, 
iov=0x7fff900008c0, niov=15, fds=0x0, nfds=0x0, errp=0x7fff9f9fe950)
    at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/io/channel.c:56
#4  0x0000555555a3ddc2 in qio_channel_readv (errp=0x7fff9f9fe950, 
niov=<optimized out>, iov=<optimized out>, ioc=0x5555568c5a00)
    at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/io/channel.c:197
#5  0x0000555555a3ddc2 in qio_channel_readv_all_eof (ioc=0x5555568c5a00, 
iov=<optimized out>, niov=<optimized out>, address@hidden)
    at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/io/channel.c:106
#6  0x0000555555a3de79 in qio_channel_readv_all (ioc=<optimized out>, 
iov=<optimized out>, niov=<optimized out>, address@hidden)
    at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/io/channel.c:142
#7  0x0000555555794768 in multifd_recv_thread (opaque=0x5555570e5e00)
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---up
    at /mnt/kvm/qemu/cleanup/migration/ram.c:722
#8  0x00007ffff2cc036d in start_thread (arg=0x7fff9f9ff700)
    at pthread_create.c:456
#9  0x00007ffff29f8bbf in clone ()
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:97
(gdb) up

Removing this unref fixed things, so I think that the accounting is good
(famous last words).

Later, Juan.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]