qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 07/22] target/s390x: move some s390x typedefs


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 07/22] target/s390x: move some s390x typedefs to cpu-qom.h
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:04:43 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 13.09.2017 16:44, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 13.09.2017 16:27, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 13.09.2017 15:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> This allows us to drop inclusion of cpu_models.h in cpu-qom.h, and
>>> prepares for using cpu-qom.h as a s390 specific version of typedefs.h
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  target/s390x/cpu-qom.h    | 5 ++++-
>>>  target/s390x/cpu.h        | 5 +++--
>>>  target/s390x/cpu_models.h | 8 ++++----
>>>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>> index 372f7d8885..4a0a59dfbc 100644
>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>>  
>>>  #include "qemu-common.h"
>>>  #include "cpu-qom.h"
>>> +#include "cpu_models.h"
>>
>> Do we really need to include cpu_models.h here? Looking at your changes
>> below, it does not seem to be necessary?
> 
> Yes, due to s390_has_feat(), and I want to avoid cleaning all the other
> calling places up in this patch.

OK, I just checked and it indeed blows up in a lot of places, so I think
this include here is justified.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]