qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv6 0/6] seccomp: feature refactoring


From: Eduardo Otubo
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv6 0/6] seccomp: feature refactoring
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:32:15 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3+47 (5f034395e53d) (2017-05-23)

On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 01:44:02PM +0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> v6:
>     * remove switch-case
>     * invert obsolete option logic at vl.c
>     * remove debug info
> v5:
>     * replaced strcmp by g_str_equal
>     * removed useless goto
>     * fixed style problems
> 
> v4:
>     * include another field on the struct for the modes
>     * remove priority
>     * fixed typos
>     * error handling for prctl
>     * add allow|deny values for all options
>     * error hanlding for wrong values for all options
>     * change how binary values are treated
>     * reformat help text
> 
> v3:
>     * Style problems fixed
> 
> v2:
>     * The semantics of the options "allow/deny" instead of booleans "on/off" 
> remains. 
>     * Added option 'children' to elevateprivileges
>     * Added documentation to docs/
> 
> v1:
>     * First version based on the discussion
>       https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg03348.html
> 
> Eduardo Otubo (6):
>   seccomp: changing from whitelist to blacklist
>   seccomp: add obsolete argument to command line
>   seccomp: add elevateprivileges argument to command line
>   seccomp: add spawn argument to command line
>   seccomp: add resourcecontrol argument to command line
>   seccomp: adding documentation to new seccomp model
> 
>  docs/seccomp.txt         |  31 +++++
>  include/sysemu/seccomp.h |   8 +-
>  qemu-options.hx          |  26 +++-
>  qemu-seccomp.c           | 325 
> ++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>  vl.c                     |  82 +++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 docs/seccomp.txt
> 
> -- 
> 2.13.5
> 
> 

Daniel or anyone else interested in reviewing, any comment left for
this patchset? If not I'll send the pull request tomorrow.

Best regards,

-- 
Eduardo Otubo
Senior Software Engineer @ RedHat



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]