qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] migration: Cancel migration at exit


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] migration: Cancel migration at exit
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:42:35 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

* Fam Zheng (address@hidden) wrote:
> On Fri, 09/15 16:03, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 01:44:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > bdrv_close_all() would abort() due to op blockers added by BMDS, clean
> > > up migration states when main loop quits to avoid that.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  include/migration/misc.h | 1 +
> > >  migration/migration.c    | 7 ++++++-
> > >  vl.c                     | 3 +++
> > >  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/migration/misc.h b/include/migration/misc.h
> > > index c079b7771b..b9a26b0898 100644
> > > --- a/include/migration/misc.h
> > > +++ b/include/migration/misc.h
> > > @@ -54,5 +54,6 @@ bool migration_has_failed(MigrationState *);
> > >  /* ...and after the device transmission */
> > >  bool migration_in_postcopy_after_devices(MigrationState *);
> > >  void migration_global_dump(Monitor *mon);
> > > +void migrate_cancel(void);
> > >  
> > >  #endif
> > > diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> > > index 959e8ec88e..2c844945c7 100644
> > > --- a/migration/migration.c
> > > +++ b/migration/migration.c
> > > @@ -1274,11 +1274,16 @@ void qmp_migrate(const char *uri, bool has_blk, 
> > > bool blk,
> > >      }
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -void qmp_migrate_cancel(Error **errp)
> > > +void migrate_cancel(void)
> > >  {
> > >      migrate_fd_cancel(migrate_get_current());
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +void qmp_migrate_cancel(Error **errp)
> > > +{
> > > +    migrate_cancel();
> > > +}
> > > +
> > 
> > Nit: I would prefer just call migrate_fd_cancel() below, since I don't
> > see much point to introduce migrate_cancel() which only calls
> > migrate_fd_cancel()...
> 
> migrate_get_current() is a migration internal IMHO. But that can be moved to
> migrate_fd_cancel() so the parameter is dropped.
> 
> > 
> > >  void qmp_migrate_set_cache_size(int64_t value, Error **errp)
> > >  {
> > >      MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
> > > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> > > index fb1f05b937..abbe61f40b 100644
> > > --- a/vl.c
> > > +++ b/vl.c
> > > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > >  #include "sysemu/blockdev.h"
> > >  #include "hw/block/block.h"
> > >  #include "migration/misc.h"
> > > +#include "migration/savevm.h"
> > >  #include "migration/snapshot.h"
> > >  #include "migration/global_state.h"
> > >  #include "sysemu/tpm.h"
> > > @@ -4799,6 +4800,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> > >      iothread_stop_all();
> > >  
> > >      pause_all_vcpus();
> > > +    migrate_cancel();
> > 
> > IIUC this is an async cancel, so when reach here the migration thread
> > can still be alive.  Then...
> > 
> > > +    qemu_savevm_state_cleanup();
> > 
> > ... Here calling qemu_savevm_state_cleanup() may be problematic if
> > migration thread has not yet quitted.
> > 
> > I'm thinking whether we should make migrate_fd_cancel() wait until the
> > migration thread finishes (state change to CANCELLED).  Then the
> > migration thread will do the cleanup, and here we can avoid calling
> > qemu_savevm_state_cleanup() as well.
> 
> But if the migration thread is stuck and CANCELLED is never reached, we'll 
> hang
> here?

I'm not sure I see an easy fix; I agree with Peter that calling
migrate_cancel() followed by qemu_savevm_state_cleanup() is racy,
because the cancel just forces the state to CANCELLING before coming
back to you, and the migration thread asynchronously starts to
fail/cleanup.

migrate_cancel() can forcibly unblock some cases because it calls
shutdown(2) on the network fd, but there are other ways for a migration
to hang.

Having said that,  the migration thread does it's calls
to qemu_savevm_state_cleanup under the lock_iothread;
Do we have that lock at this point?

Dave

> Fam
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]