qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 15/21] spapr: modify spapr_populate_pci_d


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 15/21] spapr: modify spapr_populate_pci_dt() to use a 'nr_irqs' argument
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:49:56 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 09/19/2017 09:56 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:12:29PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> This adds some flexibility in the definition of the number of
>> available IRQS used in a sPAPR machine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> 
> This doesn't seem sensible.  You've already stated that the XIVE and
> XICS need equivalent irq number spaces, so in particular they should
> have the same number of irqs advertised.

yes. I am adding an argument to spapr_populate_pci_dt() 
because it is using the XICS_IRQS_SPAPR define directly 
and I intend to extend that number of irqs with the 
number of cpus to have room for IPIs.

C. 

>> ---
>>  hw/ppc/spapr.c              | 2 +-
>>  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c          | 4 ++--
>>  include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h | 2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> index 3e3ff1fbc988..5d69df928434 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> @@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>>      }
>>  
>>      QLIST_FOREACH(phb, &spapr->phbs, list) {
>> -        ret = spapr_populate_pci_dt(phb, PHANDLE_XICP, fdt);
>> +        ret = spapr_populate_pci_dt(phb, PHANDLE_XICP, fdt, 
>> XICS_IRQS_SPAPR);
>>          if (ret < 0) {
>>              error_report("couldn't setup PCI devices in fdt");
>>              exit(1);
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> index d84abf1070a0..05b0a067458e 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> @@ -2073,7 +2073,7 @@ static void spapr_phb_pci_enumerate(sPAPRPHBState *phb)
>>  
>>  int spapr_populate_pci_dt(sPAPRPHBState *phb,
>>                            uint32_t xics_phandle,
>> -                          void *fdt)
>> +                          void *fdt, int nr_irqs)
>>  {
>>      int bus_off, i, j, ret;
>>      char nodename[FDT_NAME_MAX];
>> @@ -2142,7 +2142,7 @@ int spapr_populate_pci_dt(sPAPRPHBState *phb,
>>      _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, bus_off, "ranges", &ranges, sizeof_ranges));
>>      _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, bus_off, "reg", &bus_reg, sizeof(bus_reg)));
>>      _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, bus_off, "ibm,pci-config-space-type", 0x1));
>> -    _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, bus_off, "ibm,pe-total-#msi", 
>> XICS_IRQS_SPAPR));
>> +    _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, bus_off, "ibm,pe-total-#msi", nr_irqs));
>>  
>>      /* Dynamic DMA window */
>>      if (phb->ddw_enabled) {
>> diff --git a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>> index 38470b2f0e5c..40146f72c103 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ PCIHostState *spapr_create_phb(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, 
>> int index);
>>  
>>  int spapr_populate_pci_dt(sPAPRPHBState *phb,
>>                            uint32_t xics_phandle,
>> -                          void *fdt);
>> +                          void *fdt, int nr_irqs);
>>  
>>  void spapr_pci_rtas_init(void);
>>  
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]