qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] spapr/rtas: disable the decrementer interru


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] spapr/rtas: disable the decrementer interrupt when a CPU is unplugged
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 23:15:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 10/06/2017 11:07 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 06:49:58PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> When a CPU is stopped with the 'stop-self' RTAS call, its state
>> 'halted' is switched to 1 and, in this case, the MSR is not taken into
>> account anymore in the cpu_has_work() routine. Only the pending
>> hardware interrupts are checked with their LPCR:PECE* enablement bit.
>>
>> If the DECR timer fires after 'stop-self' is called and before the CPU
>> 'stop' state is reached, the nearly-dead CPU will have some work to do
>> and the guest will crash. This case happens very frequently with the
>> not yet upstream P9 XIVE exploitation mode. In XICS mode, the DECR is
>> occasionally fired but after 'stop' state, so no work is to be done
>> and the guest survives.
>>
>> I suspect there is a race between the QEMU mainloop triggering the
>> timers and the TCG CPU thread but I could not quite identify the root
>> cause. To be safe, let's disable the decrementer interrupt in the LPCR
>> when the CPU is halted and reenable it when the CPU is restarted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>> index cdf0b607a0a0..2389220c9738 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>> @@ -174,6 +174,15 @@ static void rtas_start_cpu(PowerPCCPU *cpu_, 
>> sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>>          kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
>>  
>>          env->msr = (1ULL << MSR_SF) | (1ULL << MSR_ME);
>> +
>> +        /* Enable DECR interrupt */
>> +        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_3_00) {
> 
> Hm.  Checking mmu_model doesn't seem right to me.  I mean, it'll get
> the right answer in practice, but the LPCR programming has nothing
> whatsoever to do with the MMU.
> 
> I think explicitly checking if cpu_ is a POWER9 instance with
> object_dynamic_cast would be a better option.

OK. So I guess we should change the switch statement in cpu_ppc_set_papr()
also.

C. 

> 
>> +            env->spr[SPR_LPCR] |= LPCR_DEE;
>> +        } else {
>> +            /* P7 and P8 both have same bit for DECR */
>> +            env->spr[SPR_LPCR] |= LPCR_P8_PECE3;
>> +        }
>> +
>>          env->nip = start;
>>          env->gpr[3] = r3;
>>          cs->halted = 0;
>> @@ -210,6 +219,13 @@ static void rtas_stop_self(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
>> sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>>       * no need to bother with specific bits, we just clear it.
>>       */
>>      env->msr = 0;
>> +
>> +    if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_3_00) {
>> +        env->spr[SPR_LPCR] &= ~LPCR_DEE;
>> +    } else {
>> +        /* P7 and P8 both have same bit for DECR */
>> +        env->spr[SPR_LPCR] &= ~LPCR_P8_PECE3;
>> +    }
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline int sysparm_st(target_ulong addr, target_ulong len,
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]