Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/8] s390x: improve error handling for SSCH and RSCH

[Cornelia Huck]

On Wed,  4 Oct 2017 17:41:39 +0200
Halil Pasic <address@hidden> wrote:

> Simplify the error handling of the SSCH and RSCH handler avoiding
> arbitrary and cryptic error codes being used to tell how the instruction
> is supposed to end.  Let the code detecting the condition tell how it's
> to be handled in a less ambiguous way.  It's best to handle SSCH and RSCH
> in one go as the emulation of the two shares a lot of code.
> 
> For passthrough this change isn't pure refactoring, but changes the
> way kernel reported EFAULT is handled. After clarifying the kernel
> interface we decided that EFAULT shall be mapped to unit exception.
> Same goes for unexpected error codes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <address@hidden>
> ---
> 
> AFAIR we decided in the previous round to rather do transformation
> and fixing in one patch than touch stuff twice. Hence this patch
> ain't pure transformation any more.
> ---
>  hw/s390x/css.c              | 83 
> +++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c         | 11 +++---
>  hw/vfio/ccw.c               | 30 ++++++++++++----
>  include/hw/s390x/css.h      | 24 +++++++++----
>  include/hw/s390x/s390-ccw.h |  2 +-
>  target/s390x/ioinst.c       | 53 ++++-------------------------
>  6 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)

After browsing through this patch, I think the change will work just as
well if you use e.g. #defines instead of the structure, won't it?