[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu devel PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add entries for Smartfu
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu devel PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add entries for Smartfusion2 |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:11:17 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
Hi Sundeep, Peter.
> On 11/09/2017 08:55 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 9 November 2017 at 21:46, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> >> Hi Subbaraya,
> >>
> >> On 11/09/2017 09:02 AM, Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> >>> add voluntarily myself as maintainer for Smartfusion2
> >>
> >> You need to share your GnuPG key signed, I couldn't find it using
> >> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=Subbaraya+Sundeep
> <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=Subbaraya+Sundeep>
> >>
> >> from https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPullRequest
> <https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPullRequest> :
> >
> > I don't in general expect to take pull requests from
> > everybody listed as a maintainer in the MAINTAINERS file.
> > That just means "I'm going to be reviewing and should
> > be cc'd on patches". Pull requests are sent by people
> > who are maintainers for a subsystem. Rule of thumb:
> > unless somebody asks you to send a pull request, you
> > don't need to do it.
>
> Ok, please apologize my misunderstanding. I still think the M: entry
Peter: Oops :) read "I apologize"
> stand for 'Maintainer' instead of 'Mail', and still don't understand the
> difference with a "Designated reviewer" (R: entry):
>
> M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@hidden>
> R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@hidden>
> These reviewers should be CCed on patches.
>
> "Designated reviewer" seems to duplicate the M: entry and is therefore
> confusing. Can we simply remove it instead?
>
> When introduced in fdf6fab4df4 the explanation was:
>
> --
> Some people are not content with the amount of mail they get, and would
> like to be CCed on patches for areas they do not maintain. Let them
> satisfy their own appetite for qemu-devel messages.
>
> Seriously: the purpose here is a bit different from the Linux kernel.
> While Linux uses "R" to designate non-maintainers for reviewing patches
> in a given area, in QEMU I would also like to use "R" so that people can
> delegate sending pull requests while keeping some degree of oversight.
> --
>
> Do you want me to remove M: and put only R: ?
No, it seems you are correct and I was wrong :)
If you agree changing the first section title to "SmartFusion2" and
eventually the second to "Emcraft M2S-FG484":
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
Regards,
Phil.