qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] segfault in parallel blockjobs (iotest 30)


From: Alberto Garcia
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] segfault in parallel blockjobs (iotest 30)
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:31:46 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu)

On Tue 21 Nov 2017 04:18:13 PM CET, Anton Nefedov wrote:

>>> Or, perhaps another approach, keep BlockJob referenced while it is
>>> paused (by block_job_pause/resume_all()). That should prevent it
>>> from deleting the BB.
>> 
>> Yes, I tried this and it actually solves the issue. But I still think
>> that the problem is that block jobs are allowed to finish when they
>> are paused.
>
> Agree, but
>
>> Adding block_job_pause_point(&s->common) at the end of stream_run()
>> fixes the problem too.
>
> would be a nice fix, but it only works unless the job is already
> deferred, right?

Right, I didn't mean to propose it as the proper solution (it would
still leave mirror job vulnerable because it's already paused by the
time it calls defer_to_main_loop()).

> This:
>
>  >> keep BlockJob referenced while it is
>  >> paused (by block_job_pause/resume_all()). That should prevent it from
>  >> deleting the BB.
>
> looks kind of hacky; maybe referencing in block_job_pause() (and not
> just pause_all) seems more correct? I think it didn't work for me
> right away though. But I can look more.

You have to be careful when you unref the block job because you may
destroy it, and therefore block_job_next() in block_job_resume_all()
would be using freed memory.

Berto



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]