qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI STORE BLOCK


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI STORE BLOCK
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:26:42 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0

On 22.11.2017 23:05, Pierre Morel wrote:
> Enhance the fault detection.
> 
> Fixup the precedence to check the destination path existance
> before checking for the source accessibility.
> 
> Add the maxstbl entry to both the Query PCI Function Group
> response and the PCIBusDevice structure.
> 
> Initialize the maxstbl to 128 per default until we get
> the actual data from the hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Yi Min Zhao <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h  |  1 +
>  hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 63 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
[...]
> @@ -722,6 +733,10 @@ int pcistb_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, 
> uint8_t r3, uint64_t gaddr,
>  
>      setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK);
>      return 0;
> +
> +addressing_error:
> +    program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, 6);

The label is called "addressing_error", but then you insert a
PGM_SPECIFICTATION ? According to the name of the label, I'd rather
expected a PGM_ADDRESSING here ... so maybe rename the label to
"spec_error" or something similar?

> +    return 0;
>  }

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]