[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? (was: [PATCH for-2.12 v3 01/11] spapr: add p
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? (was: [PATCH for-2.12 v3 01/11] spapr: add pseries 2.12 machine type) |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:03:45 +0100 |
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:14:28 +0100
Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> By the way, before everybody now introduces "2.12" machine types ... is
> there already a consensus that the next version will be "2.12" ?
>
> A couple of months ago, we discussed that we could maybe do a 3.0 after
> 2.11, e.g. here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-03/msg05056.html
>
> I'd still like to see that happen... Peter, any thoughts on this?
So, as I just thought about preparing the new machine for s390x as
well: Did we reach any consensus about what the next qemu version will
be called?
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 v3 01/11] spapr: add pseries 2.12 machine type, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? (was: [PATCH for-2.12 v3 01/11] spapr: add pseries 2.12 machine type),
Cornelia Huck <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? (was: [PATCH for-2.12 v3 01/11] spapr: add pseries 2.12 machine type), Peter Maydell, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Cornelia Huck, 2017/11/23