qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI STORE


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI STORE
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:45:39 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0

On 25.11.2017 11:39, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 23/11/2017 10:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 22.11.2017 23:05, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> Enhance the fault detection, correction of the fault reporting.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <address@hidden>
>>> Reviewed-by: Yi Min Zhao <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>   hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
>>> index 3e1f1a0..930c197 100644
>>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
>>> @@ -470,6 +470,12 @@ int pcistg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t
>>> r1, uint8_t r2)
>>>       pcias = (env->regs[r2] >> 16) & 0xf;
>>>       len = env->regs[r2] & 0xf;
>>>       offset = env->regs[r2 + 1];
>>> +    data = env->regs[r1];
>>> +
>>> +    if (!(fh & FH_MASK_ENABLE)) {
>>> +        setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_INVAL_HANDLE);
>>> +        return 0;
>>> +    }
>>>         pbdev = s390_pci_find_dev_by_fh(s390_get_phb(), fh);
>>>       if (!pbdev) {
>>> @@ -479,12 +485,7 @@ int pcistg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t
>>> r1, uint8_t r2)
>>>       }
>>>         switch (pbdev->state) {
>>> -    case ZPCI_FS_RESERVED:
>>> -    case ZPCI_FS_STANDBY:
>>> -    case ZPCI_FS_DISABLED:
>>>       case ZPCI_FS_PERMANENT_ERROR:
>>> -        setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_INVAL_HANDLE);
>>> -        return 0;
>>>       case ZPCI_FS_ERROR:
>>>           setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR);
>>>           s390_set_status_code(env, r2, ZPCI_PCI_ST_BLOCKED);
>>
>> -EMISSINGPUBLICDOCUMENTATION
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> I do not understand what you mean here

Not your fault, I just wanted to express that I can not really review
this part of the patch (and thus not provide a Reviewed-by) since there
is no public documentation available for zPCI :-(

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]