Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] msi: Handle remappable format interrupt request

[Chao Gao]

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:07:48PM +0000, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:24:25PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> According to VT-d spec Interrupt Remapping and Interrupt Posting ->
>> Interrupt Remapping -> Interrupt Request Formats On Intel 64
>> Platforms, fields of MSI data register have changed. This patch
>> avoids wrongly regarding a remappable format interrupt request as
>> an interrupt binded with a pirq.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> v3:
>>  - clarify the interrupt format bit is Intel-specific, then it is
>>  improper to define MSI_ADDR_IF_MASK in a common header.
>> ---
>>  hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>  hw/pci/msi.c          |  5 +++--
>>  hw/pci/msix.c         |  4 +++-
>>  hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c   |  2 +-
>>  include/hw/xen/xen.h  |  2 +-
>>  stubs/xen-hvm.c       |  2 +-
>>  6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c b/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>> index 8028bed..52dc8af 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>> @@ -145,8 +145,16 @@ void xen_piix_pci_write_config_client(uint32_t address, 
>> uint32_t val, int len)
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> -int xen_is_pirq_msi(uint32_t msi_data)
>> +int xen_is_pirq_msi(uint32_t msi_addr_lo, uint32_t msi_data)
>>  {
>> +    /* If the MSI address is configured in remapping format, the MSI will 
>> not
>> +     * be remapped into a pirq. This 'if' test excludes Intel-specific
>> +     * remappable msi.
>> +     */
>> +#define MSI_ADDR_IF_MASK 0x00000010
>
>I don't think that is the right place for a define, they also exist
>outside of the context of the function.

yes.

>That define would be better at the top of this file, I think.(There is

will do.

Thanks
Chao

>probably a better place in the common headers, but I'm not sure were.)