qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] migration/channel errors and cancelling


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] migration/channel errors and cancelling
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:14:08 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

* Peter Xu (address@hidden) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:16:53PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden>
> > 
> > Hi,
> >   Where a channel fails asynchronously during connect, call
> > back through the migration code so it can clean up.
> >   In particular this causes the transition of a 'cancelling' state
> > to 'cancelled' in the case of:
> > 
> >     migrate -d tcp:deadhost:port
> >      <host tries to connect>
> >     migrate_cancel
> > 
> > previously the status would get stuck in cancelling because
> > the final cleanup didn't happen.
> > 
> >   This is the second part of the fix for:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525899
> 
> IIUC this series tries to deliver the connection error a long way
> until migrate_fd_connect() to handle it. But, haven't we already have
> a function migrate_fd_error() to do that (which is faster, and
> simpler)?
> 
> void migrate_fd_error(MigrationState *s, const Error *error)
> {
>     trace_migrate_fd_error(error_get_pretty(error));
>     assert(s->to_dst_file == NULL);
>     migrate_set_state(&s->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_SETUP,
>                       MIGRATION_STATUS_FAILED);
>     migrate_set_error(s, error);
>     notifier_list_notify(&migration_state_notifiers, s);
>     block_cleanup_parameters(s);
> }
> 
> I think it's not handling the case when cancelling.  If we let it to
> handle the cancelling case well, would it be a simpler fix?
>
> Moreover, I think this is another good example that migration is not
> handling the cleanup "cleanly" in general... I really hope we can do
> this better in 2.12.  I'll see whether I can give it a shot, but in
> all cases it'll be after the merging of existing patches since there
> are already quite a lot of dangling patches.

No, I think migrate_fd_error is the cause of the problem here, not the
answer.

If we stick to the simple rule that a migration must always call
migrate_fd_cleanup then the cancellation problems are fixed - I think
that's how we make migration 'clean' - a single cleanup routine
that always gets called.

Dave


> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Peter Xu
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]