[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op()
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op() |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:36:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
Le 21/12/2017 à 15:14, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 21/12/2017 15:13, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 21/12/2017 à 15:10, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
>>> On 21/12/2017 14:32, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>> Le 21/12/2017 à 14:07, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
>>>>> Le 21/12/2017 à 13:49, Thomas Huth a écrit :
>>>>>> On 20.12.2017 22:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/12/2017 20:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>>>>>> On the x86/sanitizer build, new runtime errors:
>>>>>>>> GTESTER check-qtest-m68k
>>>>>>>> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/target/m68k/translate.c:230:12:
>>>>>>>> runtime error: index -1 out of bounds for type 'const uint8_t [11]'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...and similar fails on one or two boards on most of the other
>>>>>>>> guest architectures.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These are preexisting bugs, now exposed by the boot-serial-test.
>>>>>>> Thomas, can you identify the architectures that have a problem and
>>>>>>> notify the maintainers? In the meanwhile I'll keep the boot-serial-test
>>>>>>> enhancements queued locally, and remove them from the pull request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laurent, Richard,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> looks like old_op is -1 when set_cc_op() is called here for the first
>>>>>> time. The problem can be reproduced by running the mini-kernel directly.
>>>>>> Just get http://people.redhat.com/~thuth/m68k-uart.bin and run QEMU like
>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> qemu-system-m68k -nographic -kernel ~/tmp/m68k-uart.bin -serial none
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That kernel only contains these few instructions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 0x41, 0xf9, 0xfc, 0x06, 0x00, 0x00, /* lea 0xfc060000,%a0 */
>>>>>> 0x10, 0x3c, 0x00, 0x54, /* move.b #'T',%d0 */
>>>>>> 0x11, 0x7c, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x08, /* move.b #4,8(%a0) */
>>>>>> 0x11, 0x40, 0x00, 0x0c, /* move.b %d0,12(%a0) */
>>>>>> 0x60, 0xfa /* bra.s loop */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem occurs during the second instruction (i.e. the first move.b).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have any ideas where this -1 in s->cc_op could come from?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it comes from CCOp: it's the value of CC_OP_DYNAMIC.
>>>>>
>>>>> We should not use it to access cc_op_live[].
>>>>>
>>>>> I try to find a fix, but I think Richard knows this better than me.
>>>>
>>>> This should fix the problem, but I'd like Richard checks it...
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target/m68k/translate.c b/target/m68k/translate.c
>>>> index b60909222c..721b5801da 100644
>>>> --- a/target/m68k/translate.c
>>>> +++ b/target/m68k/translate.c
>>>> @@ -225,6 +225,11 @@ static void set_cc_op(DisasContext *s, CCOp op)
>>>> s->cc_op = op;
>>>> s->cc_op_synced = 0;
>>>>
>>>> + if (old_op == CC_OP_DYNAMIC) {
>>>> + tcg_gen_discard_i32(QREG_CC_OP);
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> This tcg_gen_discard_i32 is correct, but all flags were potentially live
>>> and can be discarded if the new op uses it(*). So I'd replace "return"
>>> with "old_op = CC_OP_FLAGS".
>>
>> Yes, I agree, we can also have:
>>
>> iff --git a/target/m68k/cpu.h b/target/m68k/cpu.h
>> index afae5f68ac..5d03764eab 100644
>> --- a/target/m68k/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/m68k/cpu.h
>> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ void cpu_m68k_set_fpcr(CPUM68KState *env, uint32_t val);
>> */
>> typedef enum {
>> /* Translator only -- use env->cc_op. */
>> - CC_OP_DYNAMIC = -1,
>> + CC_OP_DYNAMIC,
>>
>> /* Each flag bit computed into cc_[xcnvz]. */
>> CC_OP_FLAGS,
>> diff --git a/target/m68k/translate.c b/target/m68k/translate.c
>> index b60909222c..61ac1a8e83 100644
>> --- a/target/m68k/translate.c
>> +++ b/target/m68k/translate.c
>> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ typedef void (*disas_proc)(CPUM68KState *env,
>> DisasContext *s, uint16_t insn);
>> #endif
>>
>> static const uint8_t cc_op_live[CC_OP_NB] = {
>> + [CC_OP_DYNAMIC] = CCF_C | CCF_V | CCF_Z | CCF_N | CCF_X,
>> [CC_OP_FLAGS] = CCF_C | CCF_V | CCF_Z | CCF_N | CCF_X,
>> [CC_OP_ADDB ... CC_OP_ADDL] = CCF_X | CCF_N | CCF_V,
>> [CC_OP_SUBB ... CC_OP_SUBL] = CCF_X | CCF_N | CCF_V,
>> @@ -237,6 +238,11 @@ static void set_cc_op(DisasContext *s, CCOp op)
>> if (dead & CCF_V) {
>> tcg_gen_discard_i32(QREG_CC_V);
>> }
>> +
>> + /* Discard any computed CC_OP value */
>> + if (old_op == CC_OP_DYNAMIC) {
>> + tcg_gen_discard_i32(QREG_CC_OP);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /* Update the CPU env CC_OP state. */
>>
>>
>
> Yes, this is good too. After my pull request is in, feel free to take
> Thomas's m68k boot-serial-test patch in your tree.
I will. I plan a PULL request before the end of the week.
Thanks,
Laurent
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 44/46] blockdev: convert internal NBD server to QIONetListener, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 44/46] blockdev: convert internal NBD server to QIONetListener, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/20
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 46/46] chardev: convert the socket server to QIONetListener, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/46] First batch of misc patches for QEMU 2.12, Peter Maydell, 2017/12/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/46] First batch of misc patches for QEMU 2.12, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op() (was: [PULL 00/46] First batch of misc patches for QEMU 2.12), Thomas Huth, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op(), Laurent Vivier, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op(), Laurent Vivier, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op(), Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op(), Laurent Vivier, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op(), Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op(),
Laurent Vivier <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op(), Laurent Vivier, 2017/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] out of bounds in set_cc_op(), Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/21
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/46] First batch of misc patches for QEMU 2.12, no-reply, 2017/12/20