[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testc
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH for-2.12 0/2] ACPI/unit-test: Add a testcase |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2017 20:24:34 +0100 |
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 19:38:20 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:01:59PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > Hi Eduardo,
> >
> > At 12/19/2017 06:09 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:08:53PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > These are the patches left over from the pull request:
> > > >
> > > > [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] x86 and machine queue, 2017-10-05
> > > >
> > > > because of some errors when tested by "make check" command[1].
> > > >
> > > > Now, the QEMU 2.11.0 has been released, rebase/retest/respin them
> > > > for v2.12 dev.
> > > >
> > > > Changelog:
> > > > --Rebase and retest this patch in v2.11.0
> > > > --Update the DSDT.numamem:
> > > >
> > > > [1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-10/msg01334.html
> > >
> > > Do we know what caused the failures Peter saw, and if we can now
> > > be sure it won't happen again?
> >
> > Sorry, I can't. I tested it many times with my colleagues, it won't
> > happen like Peter saw. This issue is very subtle and funny. Could you
> > give me some suggestions?
>
> I guess all we can do is to ask Peter to test if the issue is
> still reproducible.
>
> Peter, do you prefer that I just send a regular pull request
> asking for testing, or do you prefer to apply this series and
> test it manually before I send a pull request?
>
> >
> > BTW, I used "make TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=1 check" to create the DSDT
> > file. Is it correct?
>
> This sounds correct to me. Igor, can you confirm?
It's will rebuild/update reference tables.
I'm for merging it early and tracking/fixing issue Peter saw during this dev
cycle.