[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user/mmap.c: Avoid choosing NULL as start
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user/mmap.c: Avoid choosing NULL as start address |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Jan 2018 21:51:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
Le 06/01/2018 à 18:00, Maximilian Riemensberger a écrit :
> mmap() is required by the linux kernel ABI and POSIX to return a
> non-NULL address when the implementation chooses a start address for the
> mapping.
>
> The current implementation of mmap_find_vma_reserved() can return NULL
> as start address of a mapping which leads to subsequent crashes inside
> the guests glibc, e.g. output of qemu-arm-static --strace executing a
> test binary stx_test:
>
> 1879
> mmap2(NULL,8388608,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS|0x20000,-1,0)
> = 0x00000000
> 1879 write(2,0xf6fd39d0,79) stx_test: allocatestack.c:514:
> allocate_stack: Assertion `mem != NULL' failed.
>
> This patch fixes mmap_find_vma_reserved() by skipping NULL as start
> address while searching for a suitable mapping start address.
>
> CC: Riku Voipio <address@hidden>
> CC: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
> CC: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Riemensberger <address@hidden>
> ---
> linux-user/mmap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/mmap.c b/linux-user/mmap.c
> index 4888f53..20cc5a7 100644
> --- a/linux-user/mmap.c
> +++ b/linux-user/mmap.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static abi_ulong mmap_find_vma_reserved(abi_ulong start,
> abi_ulong size)
> addr = end_addr - qemu_host_page_size;
>
> while (1) {
> - if (addr > end_addr) {
> + if (!addr || addr > end_addr) {
> if (looped) {
> return (abi_ulong)-1;
> }
I think this is correct, but it would be clearer to not exit the loop if
addr is NULL, something like:
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static abi_ulong mmap_find_vma_reserved(abi_ulong
start, abi_ulong size)
if (prot) {
end_addr = addr;
}
- if (addr + size == end_addr) {
+ if (addr && addr + size == end_addr) {
break;
}
addr -= qemu_host_page_size;
The result is the same because with the "addr -= qemu_host_page_size"
addr becomes greater than end_addr on the next loop.
Thanks,
Laurent