Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] Updates based on feedback.

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 08:12:57PM +0000, Justin Terry (VM) via Qemu-devel 
wrote:
> I have only tried Ubuntu and Windows guests. Is there a set you would 
> recommend to try out?
> 
> As for limitations, this set of patches allows for both bios and efi based 
> boots (we have been using TianoCore). We will continue to submit patches 
> around performance tuning on the platform but basic functionality is up and 
> running in this set. The VGA interrupt path can be improved and we are 
> looking at options here to make this a smoother experience. And as mentioned 
> in the update we don't have CPUID support fully implemented yet for migration 
> scenarios. Was there a specific set of things you were wondering that I could 
> investigate or provide clarity on?

That sounds good.  I was just wondering what the general status was.

There is no particular set of tests I had in mind.  The KVM kernel
module has a test suite called kvm-unit-tests for low-level guest code
tests (http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/KVM-unit-tests).  There are also
high-level tests written using the Avocado framework
(https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Avocado).  Neither of these is
immediately useful or necessary for WHPX though.

Stefan

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature