qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 27/29] qapi: Move qapi-schema.json to qapi/,


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 27/29] qapi: Move qapi-schema.json to qapi/, rename generated files
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:51:41 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:

> On 02/11/2018 03:36 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Move qapi-schema.json to qapi/, so it's next to its modules, and all
>> files get generated to qapi/, not just the ones generated for modules.
>>
>> Consistently name the generated files qapi-MODULE.EXT:
>> qmp-commands.[ch] become qapi-commands.[ch], qapi-event.[ch] become
>> qapi-events.[ch], and qmp-introspect.[ch] become qapi-introspect.[ch].
>> This gets rid of the temporary hacks in scripts/qapi/commands.py and
>> scripts/qapi/events.py.
>
> Ah, so my parallel series that proposed naming the file
> qapi/qmp-schema.qapi gets interesting, with your patch favoring the
> qapi- naming everywhere.  I'll have to think about how much (or
> little) of my series to rebase on top of this (I like my notion of
> renaming to the .qapi suffix, though, as we really are using files
> that aren't JSON, but only resemble it).
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>> ---
>
>> +++ b/.gitignore
>> @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@
>>   /qga/qapi-generated
>>   /qapi-generated
>>   /qapi-gen-timestamp
>> -/qapi-builtin-types.[ch]
>> -/qapi-builtin-visit.[ch]
>> +/qapi/qapi-builtin-types.[ch]
>> +/qapi/qapi-builtin-visit.[ch]
>
> Might be some interesting churn if you like my idea of using globs for
> easier maintenance of this file.
>
>> +++ b/tpm.c
>> @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ int tpm_config_parse(QemuOptsList *opts_list, const char 
>> *optarg)
>>     /*
>>    * Walk the list of active TPM backends and collect information about them
>> - * following the schema description in qapi-schema.json.
>>    */
>
> Should the overall comment keep the trailing '.'?

I'm fine either way.

> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

Thanks!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]