qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] target/arm: Add the XML dynamic generati


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] target/arm: Add the XML dynamic generation
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:05:56 +0000

On 6 March 2018 at 15:29, Abdallah Bouassida
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>>> diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c
>>> index f1d5148..ffab30b 100644
>>> --- a/gdbstub.c
>>> +++ b/gdbstub.c
>>> @@ -665,6 +665,9 @@ static const char *get_feature_xml(const char *p, const 
>>> char **newp,
>>>              pstrcat(target_xml, sizeof(target_xml), "<xi:include href=\"");
>>>              pstrcat(target_xml, sizeof(target_xml), cc->gdb_core_xml_file);
>>>              pstrcat(target_xml, sizeof(target_xml), "\"/>");
>>> +            if (cc->gdb_has_dynamic_xml) {
>>> +                cc->register_gdb_regs_for_features(cpu);
>>> +            }
>> I don't think we need a callback hook for this. You could just assume
>> the target code has already done whatever it needs. Specifically for
>> arm you can just make arm_cpu_register_gdb_regs_for_features() in helper.c
>> call gdb_register_coprocessor(..., "system-registers.xml",...) the
>> same way it already does for other xml files.
> I think in this case, for ARM64, if the execution mode has changed (to 
> AARCH32) the time we connect
> to gdbstub then we will get the registers view of AARCH64 instead of AARCH32, 
> as we have created
> our XML at the beginning (on arm_cpu_register_gdb_regs_for_feature()) where 
> the CPU is
> on AARCH64.

The gdbstub code does not currently support guests flipping between
AArch32 and AArch64 -- it always exposes the AArch64 view of an
AArch64 CPU even if it happens to be in AArch32. This is obviously
unfortunate, but traditionally gdb has not supported the target
flipping architecture like this. I think that recent gdb changes
have enhanced the protocol to permit this, but adapting QEMU
to use them is a big job that you don't really want to make this
series be dependent on.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]