qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: Silence migration-test 'bad' test


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: Silence migration-test 'bad' test
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:10:29 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 05:30:42PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden>
> 
> In 2c9bb29703c I added a migration test that purposely fails;
> unfortunately it prints a copy of the failure message to stderr
> which makes the output a bit messy.
> 
> Hide stderr for that test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/migration-test.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/migration-test.c b/tests/migration-test.c
> index 74f9361bdd..422bf1afdf 100644
> --- a/tests/migration-test.c
> +++ b/tests/migration-test.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static void migrate_start_postcopy(QTestState *who)
>  }
>  
>  static void test_migrate_start(QTestState **from, QTestState **to,
> -                               const char *uri)
> +                               const char *uri, bool hide_stderr)
>  {
>      gchar *cmd_src, *cmd_dst;
>      char *bootpath = g_strdup_printf("%s/bootsect", tmpfs);
> @@ -427,6 +427,17 @@ static void test_migrate_start(QTestState **from, 
> QTestState **to,
>  
>      g_free(bootpath);
>  
> +    if (hide_stderr) {
> +        gchar *tmp;
> +        tmp = g_strdup_printf("%s 2>/dev/null", cmd_src);
> +        g_free(cmd_src);
> +        cmd_src = tmp;
> +
> +        tmp = g_strdup_printf("%s 2>/dev/null", cmd_dst);
> +        g_free(cmd_dst);
> +        cmd_dst = tmp;

I thought this would affect QTEST_LOG in
qtest_init_without_qmp_handshake() but I was wrong.  I think that's
because that "/dev/fd/2" is a string passed to QEMU process, so only
the stderr of test process is closed while we kept the QTEST_LOG
there, which seems to be ideal.

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
Tested-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]