qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/sparc/sun4m: Fix implicit creation of "-driv


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/sparc/sun4m: Fix implicit creation of "-drive if=scsi" devices
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 05:33:52 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0

On 07.03.2018 19:43, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 07/03/18 09:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
> 
>> The global hack for creating SCSI devices has recently been removed,
>> but this apparently broke SCSI devices on some boards that were not
>> ready for this change yet. For the sun4m machines you now get:
>>
>> $ sparc-softmmu/qemu-system-sparc -boot d -cdrom x.iso
>> qemu-system-sparc: -cdrom x.iso: machine type does not support
>> if=scsi,bus=0,unit=2
>>
>> Fix it by calling scsi_bus_legacy_handle_cmdline() after creating the
>> corresponding SCSI controller.
>>
>> Reported-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
>> Fixes: 1454509726719e0933c800fad00d6999752688ea
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>   hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> index 61eb424..0f5804b 100644
>> --- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> +++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> @@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ static void *sparc32_dma_init(hwaddr dma_base,
>>         esp = ESP_STATE(object_resolve_path_component(OBJECT(espdma),
>> "esp"));
>>       sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(esp), 0, esp_base);
>> +    scsi_bus_legacy_handle_cmdline(&esp->esp.bus);
>>         ledma = SPARC32_LEDMA_DEVICE(object_resolve_path_component(
>>                                    OBJECT(dma), "ledma"));
>>
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> Thanks for the patch - I can confirm that it resolves the issue with
> qemu-system-sparc.
> 
> Tested-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
> 
> I presume it makes sense for this to go through a tree along with the
> other patches in the set rather than me taking this via my qemu-sparc
> branch?

The patches are independent from each other, so it doesn't really
matter. So if you're planning to send a PULL request before soft freeze
next Tuesday, please include this patch. Otherwise I hope that Paolo can
take this through his misc / scsi tree.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]