Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

[Daniel P . Berrangé]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:33:13AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:10:00AM +0000, Michael Clark wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 at 11:02 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > On 6 March 2018 at 19:46, Michael Clark <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > > The following changes since commit
> > > f32408f3b472a088467474ab152be3b6285b2d7b:
> > > >
> > > >   misc: don't use hwaddr as a type in trace events (2018-03-06 14:24:30
> > > +0000)
> > > >
> > > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > >
> > > >   https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu.git tags/riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2
> > > >
> > > > for you to fetch changes up to 7051b081bf6796e5e84406f6223a7c4900bf7298:
> > > >
> > > >   RISC-V - Remove support for adhoc non-standard X_COP local-interrupt
> > > (2018-03-07 08:36:03 +1300)
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi -- I would have applied this, but some of the commits
> > > have no signed-off-by lines.
> > >
> > > This is important, and I've already asked for it once. We cannot
> > > accept anything that doesn't have a clear record in the commit
> > > message of everybody (person or company) who's contributed code
> > > to it, indicating that they're happy for their copyrighted
> > > contributions to be taken into QEMU under our license. Lists
> > > of names without emails in the cover letter are not sufficient.
> > >
> > > In fact a lot of the last part of this patchset looks like
> > > unreviewed changes/fixes that if we were going to have them we
> > > should have squashed into the correct patches and resent the
> > > series for review. Please don't do this. Code review is an
> > > important part of how the QEMU project works.
> > 
> > 
> > You must be looking at the wrong tag. There are multiple sign-offs in all
> > 23 commits. The tag is riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2. Sagar and Bastian
> > contacted me out of band to add their sign-offs. Please look at the commits
> > again and tell me which commit id doesn’t have a sign-off on that tag (23
> > commits iirc)
> 
> I've just looked at the "riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2" tag and confirm that
> the sign-offs all appear present and corrrect to me.

Actually after double checking this not correct. There are two similarly
named but subtely different tags.

Your mail referenced 'riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2' and that does contain
extra commits without signoffs.

There is another tag 'qemu-upstream-v8.2' that contains only the
signed-off commits.

So did you mention the wrong tag in the cover letter, or push the
wrong content ?

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|