|
From: | Alex Bennée |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2 |
Date: | Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:15:36 +0000 |
User-agent: | mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 26.0.91 |
Michael Clark <address@hidden> writes: <snip> > > BTW - I've integrated the following 3 branches into the riscv tree: > > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/softfloat-snan-abort-fix > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2 > - https://github.com/michaeljclark/riscv-qemu/tree/qemu-devel > > into our `riscv-all` integration branch, and we're now passing all FPU > tests, interestingly, including the NaN-boxing of single precision values > into doubles. We'll need to check that the riscv-tests testsuite is > exhastive enough... Suprised! I think Richard might have thought about > our NaN-boxing > issue or some other sort of magic is going on :-) > > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-all Is the SNaN patch going to get re-posted now it has had a review? -- Alex Bennée
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |