qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 04/14] fp-test: add muladd variants


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 04/14] fp-test: add muladd variants
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:33:55 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 26.0.91

Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden> writes:

> These are a few muladd-related operations that the original IBM syntax
> does not specify; model files for these are in muladd.fptest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/fp-test/fp-test.c     | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/fp-test/muladd.fptest | 51 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/fp-test/muladd.fptest
>
> diff --git a/tests/fp-test/fp-test.c b/tests/fp-test/fp-test.c
> index 27637c4..2200d40 100644
> --- a/tests/fp-test/fp-test.c
> +++ b/tests/fp-test/fp-test.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ enum op {
>      OP_SUB,
>      OP_MUL,
>      OP_MULADD,
> +    OP_MULADD_NEG_ADDEND,
> +    OP_MULADD_NEG_PRODUCT,
> +    OP_MULADD_NEG_RESULT,
>      OP_DIV,
>      OP_SQRT,
>      OP_MINNUM,
> @@ -69,6 +72,9 @@ static const struct op_desc ops[] = {
>      [OP_SUB] =       { "-", 2 },
>      [OP_MUL] =       { "*", 2 },
>      [OP_MULADD] =    { "*+", 3 },
> +    [OP_MULADD_NEG_ADDEND] =  { "*+nc", 3 },
> +    [OP_MULADD_NEG_PRODUCT] = { "*+np", 3 },
> +    [OP_MULADD_NEG_RESULT] =  { "*+nr", 3 },
>      [OP_DIV] =       { "/", 2 },
>      [OP_SQRT] =      { "V", 1 },
>      [OP_MINNUM] =    { "<C", 2 },
> @@ -463,6 +469,15 @@ static enum error soft_tester(struct test_op *t)
>          case OP_MULADD:
>              res = float32_muladd(a, b, c, 0, s);
>              break;
> +        case OP_MULADD_NEG_ADDEND:
> +            res = float32_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_c, s);
> +            break;
> +        case OP_MULADD_NEG_PRODUCT:
> +            res = float32_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_product, s);
> +            break;
> +        case OP_MULADD_NEG_RESULT:
> +            res = float32_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_result, s);
> +            break;
>          case OP_DIV:
>              res = float32_div(a, b, s);
>              break;
> @@ -522,6 +537,15 @@ static enum error soft_tester(struct test_op *t)
>          case OP_MULADD:
>              res64 = float64_muladd(a, b, c, 0, s);
>              break;
> +        case OP_MULADD_NEG_ADDEND:
> +            res64 = float64_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_c, s);
> +            break;
> +        case OP_MULADD_NEG_PRODUCT:
> +            res64 = float64_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_product, s);
> +            break;
> +        case OP_MULADD_NEG_RESULT:
> +            res64 = float64_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_result, s);
> +            break;
>          case OP_DIV:
>              res64 = float64_div(a, b, s);
>              break;

Are there any intrinsics we could use for the hard variant which would
be useful if we want to run under translation?

> diff --git a/tests/fp-test/muladd.fptest b/tests/fp-test/muladd.fptest
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6cd48ff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/fp-test/muladd.fptest
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +# nc == negate addend
> +b32*+nc =0 -Inf -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -1.7FFFFFP127 -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -1.6C9AE7P113 -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -1.000000P-126 -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -0.7FFFFFP-126 -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -0.1B977AP-126 -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -0.000001P-126 -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -1.000000P0 -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -Zero -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 +Zero -Inf +Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nc =0 -Zero -1.000000P-126 +1.7FFFFFP127 -> -1.7FFFFFP127
> +b32*+nc =0 +Zero -1.000000P-126 +1.7FFFFFP127 -> -1.7FFFFFP127
> +b32*+nc =0 -1.000000P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.4B9156P109 -> +1.4B9156P109 x
> +b32*+nc =0 -0.7FFFFFP-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.51BA59P-113 -> +1.7FFFFDP1 x
> +b32*+nc =0 -0.3D6B57P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.265398P-67 -> +1.75AD5BP0 x
> +b32*+nc =0 -0.000001P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.677330P-113 -> +1.7FFFFFP-22 x
> +
> +# np == negate product
> +b32*+np =0 +Inf -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +1.7FFFFFP127 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +1.6C9AE7P113 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +1.000000P-126 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +0.7FFFFFP-126 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +0.1B977AP-126 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +0.000001P-126 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +1.000000P0 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +Zero -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 +Zero -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+np =0 -Zero -1.000000P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -> -1.7FFFFFP127
> +b32*+np =0 +Zero -1.000000P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -> -1.7FFFFFP127
> +b32*+np =0 -1.3A6A89P-18 +1.24E7AEP9 -0.7FFFFFP-126 -> +1.7029E9P-9 x
> +
> +# nr == negate result
> +b32*+nr =0 -Inf -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -1.7FFFFFP127 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -1.6C9AE7P113 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -1.000000P-126 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -0.7FFFFFP-126 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -0.1B977AP-126 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -0.000001P-126 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -1.000000P0 -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -Zero -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 -Zero -Inf -Inf -> Q i
> +b32*+nr =0 +Zero -1.000000P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -> +1.7FFFFFP127
> +b32*+nr =0 -Zero -1.000000P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -> +1.7FFFFFP127
> +b32*+nr =0 -1.000000P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.4B9156P109 -> +1.4B9156P109 x
> +b32*+nr =0 -0.7FFFFFP-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.51BA59P-113 -> -1.7FFFFDP1 x
> +b32*+nr =0 -0.3D6B57P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.265398P-67 -> -1.75AD5BP0 x
> +b32*+nr =0 -0.000001P-126 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.677330P-113 -> -1.7FFFFFP-22 x
> +b32*+nr =0 +1.72E53AP-33 -1.7FFFFFP127 -1.5AA684P-2 -> +1.72E539P95 x


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]