qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] RISC-V: Fix incorrect disassembly for ad


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] RISC-V: Fix incorrect disassembly for addiw
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:15:50 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 03/27/2018 04:55 PM, Michael Clark wrote:
> This fixes a bug in the disassembler constraints used
> to lift instructions into pseudo-instructions, whereby
> addiw instructions are always lifted to sext.w instead
> of just lifting addiw with a zero immediate.
> 
> An associated fix has been made to the metadata used to
> machine generate the disseasembler:
> 
> https://github.com/michaeljclark/riscv-meta/
> commit/4a6b2f3898430768acfe201405224d2ea31e1477
> 
> Cc: Sagar Karandikar <address@hidden>
> Cc: Bastian Koppelmann <address@hidden>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Clark <address@hidden>

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

> ---
>  disas/riscv.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/disas/riscv.c b/disas/riscv.c
> index 3c17501..74ad16e 100644
> --- a/disas/riscv.c
> +++ b/disas/riscv.c
> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static const rvc_constraint rvcc_mv[] = { 
> rvc_imm_eq_zero, rvc_end };
>  static const rvc_constraint rvcc_not[] = { rvc_imm_eq_n1, rvc_end };
>  static const rvc_constraint rvcc_neg[] = { rvc_rs1_eq_x0, rvc_end };
>  static const rvc_constraint rvcc_negw[] = { rvc_rs1_eq_x0, rvc_end };
> -static const rvc_constraint rvcc_sext_w[] = { rvc_rs2_eq_x0, rvc_end };
> +static const rvc_constraint rvcc_sext_w[] = { rvc_imm_eq_zero, rvc_end };
>  static const rvc_constraint rvcc_seqz[] = { rvc_imm_eq_p1, rvc_end };
>  static const rvc_constraint rvcc_snez[] = { rvc_rs1_eq_x0, rvc_end };
>  static const rvc_constraint rvcc_sltz[] = { rvc_rs2_eq_x0, rvc_end };
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]