qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 26/29] target-microblaze: mmu: Prepare for 64


From: Edgar E. Iglesias
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 26/29] target-microblaze: mmu: Prepare for 64-bit addresses
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 15:59:39 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:54:01PM +0000, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:44 AM Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <address@hidden>
> 
> > Prepare for 64-bit addresses.
> > This makes no functional difference as the upper parts of
> > the 64-bit addresses are not yet reachable.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >   target/microblaze/mmu.c | 14 +++++++-------
> >   target/microblaze/mmu.h |  6 +++---
> >   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> > diff --git a/target/microblaze/mmu.c b/target/microblaze/mmu.c
> > index 231803ceea..a379968618 100644
> > --- a/target/microblaze/mmu.c
> > +++ b/target/microblaze/mmu.c
> > @@ -81,16 +81,16 @@ unsigned int mmu_translate(struct microblaze_mmu *mmu,
> >   {
> >       unsigned int i, hit = 0;
> >       unsigned int tlb_ex = 0, tlb_wr = 0, tlb_zsel;
> > -    unsigned int tlb_size;
> > -    uint32_t tlb_tag, tlb_rpn, mask, t0;
> > +    uint64_t tlb_tag, tlb_rpn, mask;
> > +    uint32_t tlb_size, t0;
> 
> >       lu->err = ERR_MISS;
> >       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmu->rams[RAM_TAG]); i++) {
> > -        uint32_t t, d;
> > +        uint64_t t, d;
> 
> >           /* Lookup and decode.  */
> >           t = mmu->rams[RAM_TAG][i];
> > -        D(qemu_log("TLB %d valid=%d\n", i, t & TLB_VALID));
> > +        D(qemu_log("TLB %d valid=%" PRId64 "\n", i, t & TLB_VALID));
> 
> While touching this it's probably worth updating to use qemu_log_mask with
> the MMU mask instead of the D() macro.


Yeah, I added a follow-up patch to the series that cleans up the
debug/logs in this file. I kept this particular patch as is to
avoid unrelated changes to get mixed into the 64bit conversion.

Cheers,
Edgar



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]