qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/9] i386: Add new property to control cache


From: Moger, Babu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/9] i386: Add new property to control cache info
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 23:29:30 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo Habkost [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:14 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/9] i386: Add new property to control
> cache info
> 
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:26:44AM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> > This will be used to control the cache information.
> > By default new information will be displayed. If user
> > passes "-cpu legacy-cache" then older information will
> > be displayed even if the hardware supports new information.
> > It will be "on" for machine type "pc-q35-2.10" for compatibility.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <address@hidden>
> > Tested-by: Geoffrey McRae <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  include/hw/i386/pc.h | 4 ++++
> >  target/i386/cpu.c    | 1 +
> >  target/i386/cpu.h    | 5 +++++
> >  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > index ffee841..d904a3c 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > @@ -327,6 +327,10 @@ bool e820_get_entry(int, uint32_t, uint64_t *,
> uint64_t *);
> >          .driver   = "q35-pcihost",\
> >          .property = "x-pci-hole64-fix",\
> >          .value    = "off",\
> > +    },{\
> > +        .driver   = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
> > +        .property = "legacy-cache",\
> > +        .value    = "on",\
> >      },
> >
> 
> Looks good, except that we now need pc-*-2.13 machines, and this
> should be moved to PC_COMPAT_2_12.

Ok. Sure. There is no PC_COMPAT_2_12 definition now.  I will add it and include 
this new property.

> 
> Also, I suggest squashing this with patch 5/9, and applying it
> before patch 3/9.

Ok. Sure.

> 
> --
> Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]