qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] libqtest: fail if child coredumps


From: Marc-André Lureau
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] libqtest: fail if child coredumps
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 17:04:56 +0200

Hi

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:45:31PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 24.05.2018 16:30, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > Right now tests report OK status if QEMU crashes during cleanup.
>> > Let's catch that case and fail the test.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> >  tests/libqtest.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tests/libqtest.c b/tests/libqtest.c
>> > index 43fb97e..f869854 100644
>> > --- a/tests/libqtest.c
>> > +++ b/tests/libqtest.c
>> > @@ -103,8 +103,15 @@ static int socket_accept(int sock)
>> >  static void kill_qemu(QTestState *s)
>> >  {
>> >      if (s->qemu_pid != -1) {
>> > +        int wstatus = 0;
>> > +        pid_t pid;
>> > +
>> >          kill(s->qemu_pid, SIGTERM);
>> > -        waitpid(s->qemu_pid, NULL, 0);
>> > +        pid = waitpid(s->qemu_pid, &wstatus, 0);
>> > +
>> > +        if (pid == s->qemu_pid && WIFSIGNALED(wstatus)) {
>> > +            assert(!WCOREDUMP(wstatus));
>> > +        }
>> >      }
>> >  }
>>
>> That's basically a good idea ... but I've already seen yet another issue
>> in the past already: QEMU sometimes simply hangs in an endless loop
>> during clean up and never terminates. I think we should detect that
>> situation, too. So instead of killing QEMU at the end of the testing, I 
>> think we should
>> rather try to terminate it with the QMP "quit" command. If QEMU does not
>> terminate with an exit code of 0, then the test should be flagged a
>> failed (and only if QEMU did not terminate at all, it should be killed
>> with SIGKILL).
>>
>>  Thomas
>
> Fine but can we agree to do this as a patch on top? And do you have
> the time to implement this?
>
> I'm seeing patches that cause crash on cleanup, it's not a theoretical
> problem for me, so I'd like this one to go in first.

What is the difference between sending "quit" and SIGTERM (qemu has
code to handle it in termsig_handler()). Is this documented somewhere?


-- 
Marc-André Lureau



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]