[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_S
|
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:47:33 +0300 |
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:09:26PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote:
> The thing is cloud service provider might prefer sticking to the same
> level of service agreement (SLA) of keeping VF over migration,
That requirement is trivially satisfied by just a single VF :) If your
SLA does not require live migration, you should do just that.
--
MST
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/06/05
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net, Jason Wang, 2018/06/05
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net, Jason Wang, 2018/06/12
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net, Samudrala, Sridhar, 2018/06/13
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net, Jason Wang, 2018/06/13
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/06/21
Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net, Siwei Liu, 2018/06/21