qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 1/3] pci_expander_bridge: add type TYPE_PXB_PCI


From: Zihan Yang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 1/3] pci_expander_bridge: add type TYPE_PXB_PCIE_HOST
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:29:19 +0800

Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> 于2018年6月13日周三 下午10:46写道:
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 04:23:40PM +0800, Zihan Yang wrote:
> > Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> 于2018年6月12日周二 下午9:43写道:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:13:22PM +0800, Zihan Yang wrote:
> > > > The inner host bridge created by pxb-pcie is TYPE_PXB_PCI_HOST by 
> > > > default,
> > > > add a new type TYPE_PXB_PCIE_HOST to better utilize the ECAM of PCIe
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zihan Yang <address@hidden>
> > >
> > > I have a concern that there are lots of new properties
> > > added here, I'm not sure how are upper layers supposed to
> > > manage them all.
> > >
> > > E.g. bus_nr supplied in several places, domain_nr for which
> > > it's not clear how it is supposed to be allocated, etc.
> >
> > Indeed they seem to double the properties, but the pxb host is
> > an internal structure of pxb-pcie device, created in pxb-pcie's
> > realization procedure, and acpi-build queries host bridges instead
> > of pxb-pcie devices. This means that users can not directly specify
> > the property of pxb host bridge, but must 'inherit' from pxb-pcie
> > devices. I had thought about changing the acpi-build process,
> > but that would require more modifications.
> > As for the properties, bus_nr means the start bus number
> > of this host bridge. It is used when pxb-pcie is in pci domain 0
> > with q35 host to avoid bus number confliction. When it is placed
> > in a separate pci domain, it is not used and should be 0.
> >
> > max_bus means how many buses the user desires, EACH bus in
> > PCIe requires 1MB configuration space, thus specifying it could
> > reduce the reserved memory in MMCFG as suggested by Marcel.
> > Typically, the user can specify
> >
> > -device pxb-pcie,id=br1,bus="pcie.0",sep_domain=on,domain_nr=1,max_bus=130
> >
> > this will place the buses under this pxb host bridge in pci domain
> > 1, and reserve (130 + 1) = 131 buses for it. The start bus number
> > is always 0 currently for simplicity.
> >
> > > Can the management interface be simplified?
> > > Ideally we wouldn't have to teach libvirt new tricks,
> > > just generalize pxb support slightly.
> >
> > We can delete 'sep_domain' property, I just find 'domain_nr'
> > already indicates domain number. But domain_nr and
> > max_bus seems unremovable, although they look 'redundant'
> > because they appear twice.
> >
> > I'm not familiar with libvirt, but from the perspective of user,
> > only 2 properties are added(domain_nr and max_bus, if we
> > delete sep_domain), though the internal structure actually has
> > changed.
>
> If you want a property for an internal purpose,
> you can have a property starting with "x-" this way
> we don't commit to maintaining it.

OK, I'll change that in pxb-pcie-host.

> --
> MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]