qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] tests/device-introspection: Check that the


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] tests/device-introspection: Check that the qom-tree and qtree do not change
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 08:00:53 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

On 08/14/2018 07:53 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
>> @@ -115,10 +122,18 @@ static void test_one_device(const char *type)
>>  
>>      /*
>>       * Some devices leave dangling pointers in QOM behind.
>> -     * "info qom-tree" has a good chance at crashing then
>> +     * "info qom-tree" or "info qtree" have a good chance at crashing then.
>> +     * Also make sure that the tree did not change.
>>       */
>> -    qom_tree = hmp("info qom-tree");
>> -    g_free(qom_tree);
>> +    qom_tree_end = hmp("info qom-tree");
>> +    g_assert_cmpstr(qom_tree_start, ==, qom_tree_end);
>> +    g_free(qom_tree_start);
>> +    g_free(qom_tree_end);
>> +
>> +    qtree_end = hmp("info qtree");
>> +    g_assert_cmpstr(qtree_start, ==, qtree_end);
>> +    g_free(qtree_start);
>> +    g_free(qtree_end);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void test_device_intro_list(void)
> 
> Output of "info qom-tree" depends on hash table iteration order, but
> that could almost be considered a feature here.

Currently, it seems to work fine. If we hit a false positive with
ordering later, we still can add some code for sorting the output, I guess?

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]