[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2018 18:59:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
Am 13.09.2018 um 17:10 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 13/09/2018 14:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > + if (qemu_get_current_aio_context() == qemu_get_aio_context()) {
> > + /* If we are in the main thread, the callback is allowed to unref
> > + * the BlockBackend, so we have to hold an additional reference */
> > + blk_ref(acb->rwco.blk);
> > + }
> > acb->common.cb(acb->common.opaque, acb->rwco.ret);
> > + blk_dec_in_flight(acb->rwco.blk);
> > + if (qemu_get_current_aio_context() == qemu_get_aio_context()) {
> > + blk_unref(acb->rwco.blk);
> > + }
>
> Is this something that happens only for some specific callers? That is,
> which callers are sure that the callback is invoked from the main thread?
I can't seem to reproduce the problem I saw any more even when reverting
the bdrv_ref/unref pair. If I remember correctly it was actually a
nested aio_poll() that was running a block job completion or something
like that - which would obviously only happen on the main thread because
the job intentionally defers to the main thread.
The only reason I made this conditional is that I think bdrv_unref()
still isn't safe outside the main thread, is it?
Kevin
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/17] block: Add missing locking in bdrv_co_drain_bh_cb(), (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/17] block: Add missing locking in bdrv_co_drain_bh_cb(), Kevin Wolf, 2018/09/13
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/17] test-bdrv-drain: Test AIO_WAIT_WHILE() in completion callback, Kevin Wolf, 2018/09/13
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/17] block-backend: Fix potential double blk_delete(), Kevin Wolf, 2018/09/13
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Kevin Wolf, 2018/09/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Paolo Bonzini, 2018/09/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback,
Kevin Wolf <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Fam Zheng, 2018/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Paolo Bonzini, 2018/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Kevin Wolf, 2018/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Paolo Bonzini, 2018/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Kevin Wolf, 2018/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Paolo Bonzini, 2018/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Kevin Wolf, 2018/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Paolo Bonzini, 2018/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Kevin Wolf, 2018/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 11/17] block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback, Paolo Bonzini, 2018/09/17