[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?
|
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:28:27 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 |
On 18/10/2018 15:06, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Device "qxl" creates a memory region "qxl.vgavram" with a size taken
> from uint32_t property "ram_size", silently rounded up to the next power
> of two. It uses &error_fatal for error handling.
That's good to some extent---it means that the core code _is_ ready for
handling ENOMEM in this part of QEMU, it's just the device that doesn't
use it.
Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Markus Armbruster, 2018/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2018/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2018/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Markus Armbruster, 2018/10/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2018/10/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Markus Armbruster, 2018/10/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2018/10/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Markus Armbruster, 2018/10/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2018/10/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2018/10/22
Re: [Qemu-devel] When it's okay to treat OOM as fatal?, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2018/10/17