qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Question: Perfecting checkpatch.pl


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Question: Perfecting checkpatch.pl
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 13:33:34 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 01:27:15PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 31 October 2018 at 12:00, Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:35:15PM +0000, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> >> Perhaps checkpatch.pl should make sure the commit messages do not contain 
> >> "address@hidden" and "Reviewed-off-by"?
> >>
> >> $ git log | grep address@hidden
> >>     Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >>     Signed-off-by: Ronald Hecht <address@hidden>
> >>     Signed-off-by: Justin Chevrier <address@hidden>
> >>     Signed-off-by: Justin Chevrier <address@hidden>
> >>     Signed-off-by: Justin Chevrier <address@hidden>
> >
> > This makes sense...
> >
> >>
> >> $ git log | grep Reviewed-off-by
> >>     Reviewed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <address@hidden>
> >>     Reviewed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
> >
> > but I'm not convinced it is worth doing this, because the set of
> > mistakes people have made is enourmous, so it turns into a game
> > of whack-a-mole.
> 
> You could have checkpatch whitelist the sensible ones:
> 
> >    3127 Acked-by
> >    1834 Reported-by
> >   30991 Reviewed-by
> >   97837 Signed-off-by
> >     660 Suggested-by
> >    1951 Tested-by
> 
> and warn about the rest...

I guess warning would be ok - I don't want to discourage people from
being creative and "singing off" their patches :-)

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]