qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU and Kconfig


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU and Kconfig
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:53:08 +0100

Le jeu. 8 nov. 2018 11:30, Thomas Huth <address@hidden> a écrit :

> On 2018-11-08 10:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 07/11/2018 20:30, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> On 2018-11-07 20:24, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>> On 07/11/2018 16:41, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> >>>>> - The Kconfig parser would be used to generate the equivalent of
> what we
> >>>>>   currently have under default-configs/
> >>
> >> I think we would still have something like default-configs - but there
> >> would only be the bare minimum config switches in there, the rest would
> >> be pulled in by dependencies.
> >
> > Yes, in theory default-configs would end up empty, except for possibly
> > some commented lines to show the "default y" symbols for the target.
>
> I think we should enable the machines in the default configs (and maybe
> optional devices that are not automatically selected by machines), e.g.:
>
> CONFIG_I440FX=y
> CONFIG_Q35=y
> CONFIG_VIRTPC=y
> CONFIG_ISAPC=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO=y
> CONFIG_PARALLEL=y
>
> In configs/nemu (or configs/lean-kvm or however we'll call it), you will
> then only have:
>
> CONFIG_Q35=y
> CONFIG_VIRTPC=y
>

CONFIG_VIRTX86 seems more XXI century.

CONFIG_VIRTIO=y
>
> Would that make sense?
>
>  Thomas
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]